Transcripts
1. Using AI as a Creative Collaborator: Welcome to using AI as a creative collaborator
without losing your voice. If you have ever felt
curious about AI tools, but also a little guilty
or unsure about even admitting that curiosity out
loud, you are not alone. Many artists feel caught
between two extremes right now. On one side, there is
pressure to reject AI completely to protect
the value of handmade work. On the other side, there
is pressure to adopt every new tool immediately
or risk being left behind. Neither extreme tells
the whole story. The truth for most artists
is somewhere in the middle, and that middle ground
is exactly what this class is here to help
you define for yourself. This class is not about
convincing you to use AI and it is not about convincing
you to avoid it either. It is about helping you draw your own clear personal line between AI as a tool you might use in certain parts
of your process and AI as something that would replace the actual art making itself. That distinction matters
because a lot of the anxiety around AI comes from an
all or nothing framing. Either you use it and feel
like you are cheating or you avoid it and feel
like you are falling behind. This class offers a third
option using AI selectively in ways that support your process without ever becoming
the process itself. Think about the parts of being an artist that already
involve tools, references, and outside input. You might use photo references,
color palette generators, Pinterest boards, sketch grids, or even other people's
work as inspiration. None of that makes the
resulting art less yours. What matters is what role
that input plays and how much of the actual
decision making and handwork remains yours. AI tools can be thought of the same way as one more
category of input or assistance, rather than as a replacement
for your creative decisions. The key question is
not is this allowed, but what role is this
playing in my process, and am I comfortable
with that role? By the end of this class, you will have a short, personal, and clear statement
about how and where you use AI tools in your
own creative process. If at all, this is not
about pressure to use AI. Some artists will end this class deciding that their line is
very close to not at all, and that is a completely
valid outcome, too. The goal is clarity, not a specific answer. This class is for
illustrators, artists, and creatives who want to think through their relationship
with AI tools, honestly, without
hype, without shame, and without vague anxiety. We are aiming for a
grounded personal decision you can actually stand behind. In the next lesson, we will look at some of the lowest risk, most values aligned ways
artists are using AI right now, specifically for ideas
rather than outcomes.
2. Using AI for Ideas rather than finished outcomes: In this lesson, we're
going to look at one of the clearest and
lowest risk ways artists are using
AI tools right now, using them for ideas rather
than for finished outcomes. There is an important
difference between using AI to generate an idea and using AI
to generate the art itself. When AI produces
a finished image that you present as
your own artwork, that raises real questions
about authorship, honesty, and the value
of handmade work. But when AI helps
you brainstorm, explore options or
unblock your thinking before you do the actual
creative work yourself, the line is much clearer. Think about brainstorming tools you might already use
without a second thought, a thesaurus, a mood board app, a random word generator
when you feel stuck. AI can function in that same category as
a thinking partner, not as the artist. For example, some artists use AI chat tools to talk through
composition ideas. You might describe a scene
you are imagining and ask for a few different
ways it could be arranged. Then choose, adapt or ignore those suggestions entirely as you sketch it yourself by hand. Others use AI to quickly
generate a list of possible color
palette directions based on a mood or theme. Then go pick and
mix actual paint or digital colors themselves using their own eye and
taste to finalize it. Some illustrators use AI as a rapid sketch generator purely for reference
and inspiration, similar to browsing Pinterest, but faster and more specific
to their exact idea. They are not tracing
or copying the output. They are looking at it, taking one useful detail and building their own version
entirely by hand. The common thread in all
of these examples is that the human is still making every meaningful
creative decision. AI is helping surface
options faster, but it is not deciding what
the final piece looks like, how it feels, or what
choices define it. This is also a good
moment to think about blocked creativity
specifically. Many artists know the feeling
of staring at a blank page with too many vague ideas and
not enough starting point. Using AI briefly to generate a rough prompt, a
randomized theme, or an unexpected combination of elements can sometimes
be enough to break that stuck feeling the
same way flipping through an old sketchbook or a
stack of magazines might. It helps to set a
personal rule here. For example, some artists decide that AI can be used for
brainstorming and reference, but never for anything that ends up directly in the
final artwork. Others decide AI can help
with early rough sketches, but the final rendering
must be entirely their own hand or their
own digital brushwork. There is no single correct rule. What matters is that you choose one deliberately
instead of drifting into AI use without ever deciding what you
are comfortable with. Take a moment and think about
your own creative blocks. Where do you usually get stuck, generating an initial idea, choosing a composition, picking
colors or something else? That is often the most useful, lowest risk place
to experiment with AI as a brainstorming tool
if you choose to at all. In the next lesson, we will
look at a different category entirely using AI tools for the business side
of your practice, like mockups and marketing rather than for the
artwork itself.
3. Using AI to support your business rather than for the Artwork itself: This lesson looks
at a category of AI use that tends
to feel far less controversial for most
artists using AI tools behind the scenes for
tasks that support your art business rather
than for the artwork itself. Many of the most practical, low risk AI tools available right now are not image
generators at all. They are assistant for tasks
like writing captions, organizing product descriptions,
creating simple mockups, editing backgrounds, or drafting a rough outline for an
email or artist statement, tasks that sit clearly outside the actual
making of your art. Think about product
mockups as an example. If you sell prints,
you might use an AI assisted tool to quickly visualize how your artwork
would look framed on a wall, printed on a mug or
displayed in a room setting. The art itself is
entirely yours. The tool is simply helping
you present it more efficiently than photographing physical mockups
yourself every time. Background removal and
simple photo editing tools are another common example. Many artists already
use AI powered features inside photo editing apps to
clean up a product photo, remove a messy background, or adjust lighting
without ever touching the artwork's actual content
or creative decisions. Writing support is another
area worth mentioning. Some artists use
AI tools to help draft a rough first version
of a product description, an email newsletter
or a caption, which they then rewrite
in their own voice. Used this way, AI
functions similarly to a writing assistant helping
you get past a blank page, not as a replacement for
your own words and tone. This is also where the
earlier findability and structured language
work becomes relevant. If you are already thinking carefully about how to describe your work clearly for search
engines and AI chat tools, an AI writing assistant can
sometimes help you brainstorm phrasing faster as long as you are the one deciding
what stays honest, accurate and true to your voice. It helps to draw a
boundary here as well. For many artists, a reasonable line looks
something like this. AI tools can help
with logistics, mockups, drafts
and organization. AI tools should not write your final artist
statement word for word, and they should never replace
your voice in places where authenticity matters
most like your bio, your pricing explanation, or your direct communication
with buyers and collectors. Notice that none
of this requires you to use every available tool. Some artists will
find one or two of these examples
genuinely useful like a mock up generator or
a background remover while having no interest in
AI writing tools at all. That selective intentional use is exactly the point
of this lesson. Take a moment and think about which behind the scenes tasks in your own practice feel the most draggy or time
consuming right now, product photography, captions,
mockups or admin writing. That is often where a small, well chosen AI tool
could genuinely help without ever touching
your actual artwork. In the next lesson, we will talk about something a
little more personal, how to talk about
your AI use honestly with your audience if and
when the topic comes up.
4. How to talk about your AI use without damaging trust: This lesson is about
something many artists quietly worry about
how to talk about AI, if at all, without
damaging trust with the people who
follow and buy from them. Even light values aligned AIUs can feel like a sensitive topic to
bring up publicly, especially since so much
online conversation around AI and art has
become polarized. Some audiences feel strongly against any AI
involvement whatsoever. Others do not think
about it much at all, and some are simply
curious about how artists are
navigating this shift. The first thing worth
remembering is that you are not obligated to explain every
tool you use in your process. The same way most artists
never explained which brand of pencil sharpener or which brush they used for a
specific project. Process transparency is a
choice, not a requirement, and it is worth deciding deliberately rather
than out of anxiety. That said, some artists do
choose to be transparent, either because it
fits their values, because their audience
specifically asks, or because they want to model thoughtful AI use rather than staying silent
about it entirely. If you choose transparency, it helps to have calm, clear language ready rather than improvising an explanation
under pressure. A simple, honest disclosure
might sound like this. I sometimes use AI tools for early brainstorming
or mockups, but every piece of final artwork is made entirely by hand. Notice this statement is short, specific and does not
apologize or overexplain. It simply states a
boundary clearly. If someone asks a
more pointed question like whether a specific
piece involved AI, it helps to answer directly
rather than deflecting. If the answer is
no, say so plainly. If AI was involved in an early stage like a mood
board or rough sketch, you can explain that
specific role without feeling like you need to
justify it extensively. It is also worth remembering that curiosity is not
the same as accusation. Many people asking about AIU are not trying to catch
you doing something wrong. They are simply trying to
understand your process, especially as this topic becomes more common in creative
conversations. A calm factual answer
usually satisfies that curiosity far more
effectively than a defensive one. If you decide your
personal boundary is to avoid AI entirely, that is worth stating clearly
too, if it ever comes up. Something like I don't use AI tools in my creative
process at all. Everything from concept to
final piece is done by hand is just as valid a disclosure as describing selective use. The goal in this lesson
is not to create a perfect public statement
for every possible scenario. It is to make sure you are not caught off guard, uncertain, or overly defensive if the
topic comes up because you have already thought through your own honest
answer in advance. Take a moment and think about how you
would want to respond if someone directly
asked whether you use AI in your process. Write down a short, calm, honest answer, whatever that answer happens
to be for you. In the final lesson, we will bring everything
together into one short personal statement defining your own AI boundaries, which becomes your
class project.
5. Your Personal Statement in regards to AI usage: In this final lesson, we bring together
everything from this class into one short, clear statement that reflects your own personal
decisions about AI in your creative practice. By now, you have thought
through where AI might fit into brainstorming
or blocked creativity, where it might support
behind the scenes tasks like mock ups
or writing drafts and how you would want to
talk about any of this honestly if the topic ever
comes up with your audience. This lesson is about turning those separate reflections
into one simple, usable statement you can return
to whenever you need it. Your personal AI
boundaries statement does not need to be long,
formal or complicated. It simply needs to answer a
few core questions clearly. Where, if anywhere, do you
use AI tools in your process? What role does AI play in
those moments brainstorming, mockups, drafts, something else. And what remains entirely
yours, Nomtical what? Here is one example, written by an artist who chooses
selective low risk use. I sometimes use AI
tools to brainstorm composition ideas or generate
quick mockups for my shop. Every piece of final artwork
is entirely hand painted and no AI generated image ever appears as or
replaces my own work. Notice how specific and
calm this statement is. It does not over
explain or apologize. It simply states
clear boundaries. Here is a second
example from an artist who chooses to
avoid AI entirely. I don't use AI tools anywhere
in my creative process. From the first sketch
to the final piece, everything is made
entirely by hand, and that matters deeply to
me as part of my practice. This version is just as
valid and just as clear. Neither approach is more
correct than the other. What matters is that
the statement reflects a real considered decision rather than an
unexamined default. As you write your own version, resist the urge to make it sound impressive or overly polished. The most useful version
of this statement is the one that is honestly
true for you right now. You are allowed to revisit and update this statement later as tools change as your own
comfort level shifts or as your practice evolves. This statement can live in a few different places depending on how public
you want it to be. Some artists keep it entirely private simply as a personal
decision making tool. Others include a version of it in their artist's statement, their FAQ or their About page, especially if their audience
has asked about it directly. For your class project, write your own personal
AI Boundaries statement following the simple
structure from this lesson where AI fits, if anywhere, what role it plays, and what remains entirely yours. Upload your statement along
with one sentence about whether and where you plan to
use it publicly, if at all. Thank you for taking this class. This is a genuinely new kind of question for artists
to be navigating, and there is no universally
correct answer. What matters most is that your own relationship
with these tools comes from a real decision made with intention rather
than confusion, guilt or pressure from
either direction.
6. Some more Recommendations: Before we close out this class, I want to take a moment
to point you toward a few other classes that pair naturally with what you
just worked through here. This class focused on defining your own personal
relationship with AI tools, where they might help,
where they don't belong, and how to talk about that
honestly if it ever comes up. If this topic
resonated with you, it connects closely to a few
other classes I've created. If you have not yet taken
human made on purpose, the handmade advantage, positioning your
art in an AI world, that class is a natural
companion to this one. While this class helped
you decide how, if at all, you use AI tools
in your process, that class helps you put the human side of
your work into words. So people understand what
makes your art valuable, personal and worth choosing regardless of what
tools exist around it. If you want to
strengthen the language you use to describe your
process and your work, find your visual style in
five prompts and define your art niche in
under 30 minutes are both great next steps. They help you name the subjects, style choices, and audience
that make your work distinct, which becomes even more
valuable once you're thinking clearly about your own
creative boundaries and voice. If you're curious
about the online discoverability side
of this conversation, specifically how people
are shifting from typing keywords to asking AI chat
tools full questions, my short course on
findability and structured language for
artists is a useful next step, and it pairs closely with the boundaries work
you did in this class. And if you're ready
to build all of this into a fuller
business strategy, art that shines,
your friendly guide to branding, storytelling, and art selling and
monetize your art, the complete roadmap for
illustrators and artists, both walk through
turning clarity like this into a sustainable,
creative business. You can find all
of these classes together on my Skillshare
teacher profile, along with short
courses on pricing, burnout and creative habits, each designed to be practical and useful in under 30 minutes. If you'd like to learn
more about branding, audience growth, or finding your creative style
beyond Skillshare, you can also visit my
website at artbcada.com, where you'll find
free resources, including an art
pricing calculator, a pattern checker, and a quiz to help you find your artist DNA. If you found this class useful, following my profile is the easiest way to hear about new classes
as they come out, especially as AI tools and creative practices keep
evolving together. If there is a specific topic you'd like to see covered next, I always welcome that
feedback since many of my classes exist because
someone asked for exactly that. Thank you again for
spending this time with me. I will see you in
the next class.