Transcripts
1. Intro - QUALITY CIRCLES Problem Solving: Welcome. Previously the most
anti economic thing we could have done in the
business world in the company, wants to close the
information valves of our collaborators who
had to spend years perfecting their duties and
accumulating knowledge. We are jeers of activity
and professionalism. The leaders quality circles
for group problem-solving, which are used to attain
objectives and look and knowledge valve that had been closed for a long, long time. Welcome. I'm David, consultant manager of the firm Garcia
low-mass and Alan Perkins, the ADL Corporation for more than 15 years and nearly one hundred,
ten hundred days. I have been developing
commercial oriented programs, salesforce training
in the development of leadership or management in all types of multinational
organizations in the business world and all
types of economic activity. What does the participant
gained in this course? How will he she benefit? Well in the development
of knowledge, skills and training to rise
their level of efficiency as professionals with this class on quality circles and
group problem-solving, we are going to develop a truly essential theme
for the realization of our leadership
of excellence for the benefit of our
entire organization. We will develop this program throughout eight
important parts. One group problem-solving,
problem prevention. Three, brainstorming
for burrito decisions. Five, cos effect in Fishbone. Six, cause effect
in block process. Seven, presentation
to the management. And eight liters guide for the 10 first meetings
of the quality circles. These intensive class, we will develop a series
of exercises that will help us to implement this knowledge in
our situations. Let's start.
2. Group Problem Solving: Faced with the question how to organize our human activity
to achieve objectives? The answer historically
was the pyramid. And I say historically,
in other words, a few who had the knowledge stood at
the top of the pyramid, set the goals and the means
to achieve those goals. The means corresponded to
the entire set of the rest of the population that was below the vertex of the pyramid. But over time, the
knowledge was permeating. More people. We're
adding to the knowledge. First the Warriors,
then the Boyar see, and then new social classes were incorporated
into knowledge. In other words,
knowledge permitted from the vertex of the pyramid
to the base of the pyramid. Today, due to the democratic
nation of knowledge, of teaching, everyone can know. Everyone has access
to knowledge. Therefore, what
used to be worth it today is no longer
worth it before participation was from top to
bottom because above there were orders givers and below
there were orders receivers. Today, participation is not only sought from the top-down, but also I'm very specially
from the bottom up. And if we train
our collaborators in a rationale group
problem-solving system, which is the quality
circles methodology, we will be able to
achieve the benefits derived from the
following objectives. Objectives and benefits
reported by the quality circles within work for the achievement of objectives and
group problem-solving. One, promote the
involvement of people at work to increase motivation. Free, promote personal
development and leadership For reduce errors and rise
the management quality. Five, inspired teamwork. Six, take advantage of the synergism that is
created in teamwork. Seven, create the ability
to solve problems. Eight, built a problem
prevention attitude. Nine, improve
communications, then develop a harmonious relationship between management
and collaborators. 11, develop a great
sense of security. 12, promote cost reduction. 13, in short, the improvement of the
organization's results. What are quality circles? Group of people who meet
regularly to discover, analyze, and resolve quality and other issues in their
respective fields of work. What are the origins of the members of
the quality circles? The members of the quality
circles must be from the same industry
or do similar work so that the issues
that they choose are challenges that everyone
is familiar with. How many members are
there in a group? The idea of size is
six or eight members, but the size can vary from this minus group
of three members, the largest of about 50 members. This I shall never be so
large that it does not allow each member enough time to participate in each meeting. Why is the emphasis
placed in quantity? Because a high level of
quality satisfies customers. Furthermore, an
improvement in the quality of management in
any firm activity, along with the cost reductions, results in increased
productivity and profitability. What organizations can use this philosophy of quality
circles for problem-solving. Any organization that produce goods and services
needs to involve, involved It's collaborators
and awareness of quality. Every business, every industry
and every organization, wherever it brought old or objective can
greatly benefit from the participation of all
the people who comprise it. Is the idea of thing work for group problem-solving,
a new idea. Well, years ago, scientists of human behavior, such as Maslow, Herbert MacGregor
of quality such as Deming Duran
and goto Ishikawa, as well as the guru of
management, peter Drucker, who said something
as simple but as intelligent as
management is people. Management direction is people. They integrated the
scientific theories on human behavior with the
theories of quality. How are the quality circles for the thing work program for group problem-solving
organized. The program is an
integrated system consisting of various elements. One, the members to the leaders. Three, the facilitator
or all coordinator of the program for the
management committee. And how long do work
teams meeting last? One hour, once a week or
two hours every two weeks. And what is the process? The process consists
of five phases. One, the identification
of problems to the selection of
problem-solving giving priorities. Three, The problem
is an lice and rational problem-solving
strategies are used in a group setting for the
search for a solution to the problem with a strong
emphasis on economics. And five, all members of the group makeup presentation to the management to
gain their approval. But identification can be done by members, management
or experts. But the selection of the
pleural image to be solved, its prerogative of
the team members. What happens in our
Teamwork Meeting? Different activities can be
carried out in a meeting. Choose a topic or a problem
on which the work be educate ourselves so that our members become more capable
of problem-solving. See examine the issues. De, loop for solutions
to those issues. E, make presentation and make a presentation to the management with the thing works
recommendations, what does our facilitate or do? They have? Facilitator is an
internal consultant of the organization and is the person responsible
for the coordination, direction, and expansion
of the activities of the world themes
for the solutions of group problems in
the organization. Who should be the
leader of that thing? Work? Well experienced, teach us that work
teams activities have great chances of success when the middle management is
initially in the leadership. The implementation
of this system of quality circles for
problem-solving achieves rapid acceptance
when carried out within this structure
that already exist in the organization in
which the role of middle management is already designed to carry out
a leadership role. What are the results
obtained in attitudes? Opinion polls conducted
among leaders and members consistently
show on animals or near unanimous conclusions of one quality improvement and
do elevation of morality. And in all the poles, it is said that
the activities of the quality circles should
be continuous and extended. When are the members strain? During the meetings of the
woodwork that are used both for training and for the study of problems
and projects. What are the techniques in
which they are drained? The most common techniques are brainstorming,
data collection, analysis, analysis, of
course effect in fishbone, analysis of course effect in process and presentation
techniques. In many organizations,
the return of investment of teamwork
has been calculated, which is usually between 1, $6. That is, for every $1
invested is obtained $6. But the Director of this
company's value even more than the dollars
that can be obtain. The improvement in attitudes of all the participants
in the teamwork.
3. Problem Prevention: I stitch in time saves nine. Many parents are avoided with a simple precautions that
take very little time. Getting vaccinated is a
well-known preventive technique. Coat of paint last a long time and prevents rust and
corrosion problems. When the members of the
quality circle begin to study this topic of
prior and prevention. Brainstorming session
can be used in which each one presents their
ideas about the topic. Programs decreases if we
identify ways to prevent them. For example, detailed
work instructions make it easy to get the job done right away from the start. The execution of the
instructions will be better achieve if they are written
in the form of a checklist. As a result, the realization is completed correctly
with no steps skipped, and others will be able to pick off where the last one left off. As a technique of preventing
difficulties, problems, a member of the working
group may propose using more to watch a trained individual
performing the job well. Most of the time we do not
admit that we make mistakes. Let's work in such
a way that we all take responsibility
for our activities. Reduce absenteeism, and
avoid complications by substitution one
collaborator for another, which might lead to an
increase in errors. Because what group
members participation AAC then define possible
causes of problem, warns them of perspective
difficulties, costs, and effect analysis can indirectly help
reduce errors. These creates an awareness
of problem prevention. When a positive effect
arises unexpectedly, it is critical to
recognize it to ensure that it will
continue to occur. Placing charts in the workplace
provides everyone with information that helps
reinforce problem prevention. Now, a little quiz. After each point. If you want to stop the video
and think about the answer, I will give the correct
answer right away. One who can propose problems to be solved
in the quality circles. A leader, be the members, see the management, d, the personnel employed
by the company. Any of the person's
mentioned it evolved. And the answer is, any of the above mentioned person's problem
analysis sessions are usually lead by a
member of the work team. Be the leader, the facilitator, The someone from the company
related to the problem. The answer is B, the leader. Three, the most common way to identify the problem is usually a interviews were conducted
which each member be written, presentations of the
members, see brainstorming. The answer is C. Brainstorming. For beryllium analysis is the
responsibility of a leader. They'll either be the
director of the company, see the leader and
the members D, the staff of the company, ie, any of the person's
mentioned it above. The answer is C, the leader and the members. Five, who should select
the program that the members of the quality
circles should analyze? The director of the company, be the management committee. See the facilitator D, deleted? The members of the work teams. The answer is E, the members of the
word them's S6, using that technique
known as Pareto. The main problem is identified. What techniques is used next to locate the cause
of that problem? The answer is cos effect seven. Sometimes their presentation
to management is used to explain the situation of a project that is
being worked on. Is this right or
wrong? It is right. Eight members of the quality
circles shall not engage in problem prevention
techniques before all the current
problems are resolved. This is incorrect. Nine, the basic techniques of work teams for group
problem solving must be adopted so they can be used in the different
departments of the company. This is right. Then the person in charge or responsible for the
coordination of work teams in the company
is known as facilitator.
4. Brainstorming: Brainstorming is a technique for generating ideas in
a group setting. Coming up with ideas
in a group is almost always more productive
than doing so alone. The group graded potential is unlock through brainstorming. It is. This has been checked. It is critical to establish the topic before beginning
the work session. For instance, what are
the issues at work? Make it as specific as
possible better than problems. It is to concretize eight into
problems in our work area. Clearer is possible. It is best to follow certain guidelines
for brainstorming. Delivered must remember
them before each session. Ask each member for ideas on a rotation basis and continue until all ideas are exhausted. Say only one idea
per member and turn. Try to get lots of ideas. You can think of something
on any lab, say bus. There is no need to
approach any concept. It is, isn't valuable. Criticizing or
dismissing someone decreases the groups creativity. For many, it may be their first chance to
express themselves, which necessitates
a certain amount of bribery, must exercise patients. Welcoming all stimulating
their ideas is amassed. They require your assistance. Create a relaxing atmosphere for this activity without mocking, laughing, with warm smiles in formality and not
mocking laughter. Exaggeration may
be a lot of fun. Humor might also help
you to be more grid if the sessions begins after the rules have
been explained, it might be important to simplify a complex concept
from time to time. The leader has the
authority to do so, but only with the permission of the person who came
up with the proposal. Idea should not be valued in any manner while they
are being graded. Nobody should do that. Not the leader, not
critical comments and certainly not positive ones. Make no remarks of any type. Separate creativity
from judgment. In a nutshell, evaluative
phases and creative phases, the thoughts must
be written down on the flip chart by a
member of the work team. At the time they are expressed. When you run out of ideas,
brainstorming is over. After that, the ideas
will be submitted to our critical study to
limit the number of them, to decrease the
number of concepts. Similar ones are
grouped to save time. A simple bolting
technique can be used. Since the members of the work team know the
subject very well. They are the experts in it. First volt put each
idea to a boat. The leader writes down each
volt next to the idea. You can vote for as
many ideas as you want. Only favorable boats are
taking into account. No one is asked to
vote against any idea. This has been the critical
analysis of the ideas of the first boat by experts
which saves time cycle. The ideas with the most votes. Members decide how many
they want to work on. This way, they focus
their attention on the most important ones without feeling overwhelmed
by so many ideas. Second volt, both
again as before, but now on the reduced number, this is the second bailout. Can you discuss this now? Yes, you can present
the arguments for and against an idea. Everyone can participate in
the discussion if they want. And when the discussion is over, there is a third boat. This third Bolt is the
qualitative bailout. And not as in the first case, the first bailout, which
was the quantitative. What topics can be the subject of a
brainstorming session? Code of conduct for
group members is a February topic for the
new quality circles. Some quantitative circles use brainstorming to determine
their own goals. Other topics like problem
that impede quality, etc. It is necessary to identify
the problems that are under the competence and control of
the quality circle itself, not the problems of others. You can build a long list of problems they could
be dealt with. Analyzing potential problems
is very productive. Also brainstorming solutions
to problems can be found. Something to remember,
if at all feasible, leave the flip chart pages using the brainstorming
session exposed so that the members or other individuals
can add something. After our brainstorming session, many ideas are hatched. It is often said, let's slip on it. Ideas are racist When using Ruggiero Kipling's on
its servants questions, when and where, who
and how, what and why. Members of the equator
circle can add something to the relationship of the
brainstorming session. If a visitor enters during
a brainstorming session, you can invite them
to participate, but explain to them the rules. Sometimes a member of the work team can lead the
brainstorming session. Finally, get used to write down on the brain storming
session paper. That topic discussed,
the name of the leader or the quality
circle and the date. This information
is essential for the analysis to half
a historical value. Now, I suggest an
interesting questionnaire, one in practice, it
is not necessarily to repeat the brainstorming
rules before each session. This is incorrect. Annotation of each idea that arises is not essential since many of them are not
related to the topic that is dealt with the
brainstorming session. This is incorrect. Three a member can suggest
more than one idea per turn if there is a close
relationship between them. Incorrect For
members must present their ideas in our
rotation manner following the order
previously established. This is correct. Five, during any
brainstorming session, any type of laughter
or hurtful comments on ideas provided will
be avoided, correct? Six, if during the
brainstorming session, one of the ideas
provided causes are some disagreement in another
member of the work team, decision must be interrupted
to discuss the reasons. This is incorrect. If one of the quality
circles groups is too large Example AT members, the selection of the limited
group will be allowed so that the brainstorming
session can be carried out more quickly. This is incorrect. The brainstorming technique
is used exclusively to select new topics for the
future quite a circle. This is incorrect. It should also be
used to identify problems, cause effect analysis, ways to verify the causes, search for solutions
to the problem, etc. Nine, the best way to
write down ideas is to write them in a block of nodes. Be on the blackboard, see, on a piece of paper, on a large paper
of a flip chart. And the answer is on a large piece of paper
of a flip chart. Then the person in
charge of writing down the ideas that arise in a brainstorming session
has the right to take turns when he
or she gets tired? Correct? 11 people outside the
work teams should normally be invited to attend
a brainstorming session. It is incorrect. We say normally 12. If a member of the
World team say sparse, that means that he
or she resigns from participating from that
moment in the session. It is incorrect. How was it? I'm sure very well.
5. Pareto Decisions: Decisions must be made on many issues in the
different phases of the group problem-solving
process with the quantity circles
by the work teams. To analyze decisions
and make decisions. Work teams use Pareto tables. Deciding is difficult, but I, tables makes the
process easier by quantifying the data and
allowing fact based comparison. But it was a scholar who
lived in the 19th century. He graphically represented the disproportional and
distribution of wealth among the
different social classes. He's 80, 20% rule
refers to the concept of deleted importance of the many and the greater
importance of the few. The 8020 rule, commonly known
as the Pareto principle, stated that 20% of all
causes or inputs result in 80% of all outcomes or outputs
for a given occurence. The 8020 rule is used in
businesses to discover and prioritize inputs that have the potential to be
the most productive. Managers, for example,
should evolve the most attention
to aspects that are crucial to their
company's performance once they have been identified. Although the 8020 axiom is commonly employed in
businesses and economics, it may be used in any industry, including World distribution,
personal finance, spending patterns, and even in personal relationship
infidelity. For example, 80% of
our company sales are made by 20% of the vendors, or 80% of errors
in a company are made by 20% of the employees. Or in a factory, 80% of the waste can be produced
by 20% of the workforce. There are several stages in the construction
of a Pareto table. A stage one determine the time period that the
data collection will cover. Stitch to decide what data
do you want to collect. Stage three, design a form that allows you to
collect the data. You need. Stage four, collected
data on a control paper. Here we have a
complete control sheet with the errors detected in a correspondence Department of accompany a stage five using the data from
the control sheet, build the Pareto table. This will result in a complete
palatal table in which the columns are arranged
in descending order. Suppose we have to place the columns in the
form of a tall tower. The result will be a tower made of 102 units that
will equal 100%. According to the scheme. Stage six, we're going to
build the cumulative line. It will reach a height
equal to 102 units or 100%. Let's see how we do it. Starting at 0, we extend the cumulative line to the upper right-hand corner
of the first column. It is now set at 1128. Continue the line for 26
more units to the top-right, an extension of
the second column, do the same with the
next column of 22 ones. We are getting closer when we extend the line for the column of 11 units and so on
until 100% errors. The cumulative line is
completed when it reaches the 100% level according to the percentage scale
on the right side. A stage seven, write down what it's about that others will know what to expect if
Jordan not their name of the quality
circle, theme, date, etc. Similar things must
be remembered. The burrito table
performs a great job of highlighting the core
issues and it does so graphically and with a
strong base wall effect. The cumulative line
can also help. It is used above
all to compare the before and the after
of any situation. What do you have to do
if you want to determine the percentage of the total that corresponds to a
particular column, draw some lines vertical and horizontal as shown
on the scheme. Easy subtraction will
give us the answer. To compare situations
and to know percentages. The cumulative line can be used. Can we talk about money instead of talking
about mistakes? Yes, there are times when instead of talking
about mistakes, it is better to measure money. Those conducting the
analysis may be required to express an opinion based on their unique
understanding of a subject. Priorities are set by adding
a column with the within. Factor to control
Shift mistake column. Next to those points that
are not to be changed. The number one is used
to waiting factor. The within factor grows when the importance of the
single point is increased. To get a new weighting
of the errors. Multiply the number of errors
by the weighting factor. Why do we use weighting
variables in the first place? Nobody wants their
consumers to be unhappy. To properly employ waiting, you must first determine what is more valuable
to your clients. Another factor for
waiting is origins. There are also
legal requirements. Additionally, there is a
company government pressure. Sometimes our palatal table can contain a large
number of columns. Less important columns
are often grouped in one column by
calling eight other. Be careful, don't forget it. It may be a small but important. Now a question arises. What to do after
having identified the most important problem
with the body TO table? The answer is summit
problem number one to cause effect analysis, to find the real reason. There are endless
applications for such a versatile
instrument as Pareto. But it will tables are very effective for making decisions. In many cases. It is a good idea to
use this technique that has given good
results over time. Now, again, I suggest
an interesting quiz. One, is it convenient? The Pareto Tables group
the minor columns in a column of others. The answer is correct. In theory, the maximum number
of columns that should appear in a Pareto
table are a six, be ten, C unlimited. The correct answer
is C unlimited. Three, the minimum number of columns that mass appear
in operator table is to be C3, C4, D, None. The correct answer is A2. For cumulative data
graphs facilitate better visualization of past
and present situations. The answer is correct. Five, what do we need before
building up our data table? The analysis of costs effect problems be
the Control Shift. C, the brainstorming technique. The correct answer is b, The Control Shift six. What is the technique
we use once the Pareto table has been made? The analysis, of course
affect programs be the brainstorming method,
C, Control Shift. And the correct answer is a. The analysis of course,
affect problems. Seven, that use of the
cumulative line is a mandatory be recommended
for some applications. See rarely used. The correct answer is B recommended for
some applications. But it will chart. The columns can be
arranged both in the standing order from left
to right or vice versa. The answer is wrong, incorrect. Sometimes it is
advantageous and above all, much more real that instead of the data appearing in
the number of errors, they do it in an
economic amounts. For example, in the
palette TO tables. Instead of showing
the number of errors, the amount that this error
scores should appear. The answer is correct. Ten. Has the placement
of the Pareto Tables ever been carried out
by order of origins? Correct or incorrect? The answer is correct. 11 often the results
through Pareto table immediately lead to the creation of a second Pareto table. This is right or wrong,
correct or incorrect. The answer is correct.
6. Cause / Effect in Fishbone: The objective of
the quality circle is to facilitate group
problem-solving. The problem is shown in the
rectangle on the right. Causes are on the left. Some call these the
fishbone diagram. The bones often wants to solve all the problems in
his area by himself. He sometimes asked for help
from people on his stuff. What happens when people
get down to work? To participate in the work? If you have a toothache, you don't go to the barber. If you trust someone
with your problems, let it be the experts
in the company. No one is more expert than
those who are working on what their expertise is required for members of the quality circles to support them to analyze. They choose it among those who are in the area of
their competence. The study comprises
several phases. Phase one, determine
the problem. The problem must be
defined precisely. Don't solve each
other's problems. You are not an expert
other than on your own. Phase two. In phase two, the main
groups are determined to group the possible causes
that are identified. Although the number of
poles can be unlimited, four or five polls are
usually quite a lot. For EMS are preferred. Manpower, work methods, machines and materials
or raw materials. Sometimes our fifth
M for money and as six d of territory
are incorporated, groups with a lot of experience will consider
the possibility of more specific groupings
to study the problem. Phase three, participation of the older members of
the group team in a brainstorming session to identify the possible causes
that generate the problem. Brainstorming works best
if you keep to the rules. The leader can summarize
them before each session. Half each member express
his her ideas in turn. These continuous until all
suggestions have been heard. Although a member
has many ideas, he, she can only
express one per round. If nothing comes to mind, say bus, no idea should be
considered as stupid idea. Now evaluation is made during
the brainstorming session, nor positive nor negative. Mini ideas arise when
using the harness servants of Rudolf keeping
questions when and where, how and who, what and the why. Exaggeration sometimes
stimulates creativity. Once the rules has
been explained, the brainstorming
session begins. The process is expedited. If the leader asked a member to write down ideas
as they come up, a member can say under
which groupings he or she thinks can
incorporate his idea. He, she can say, for example, under M for manpower
or attitudes. In some cases, of course, can be added as secondary branch of a topic that already
appears in the graph. The graph of a complete
brainstorming session, we'll show similar
ideas grouped. This makes the analysis easier. Our brainstorming
session is considered finished when
everyone says pass. This point, the cost
effect diagram may look like something very over
what loaded with ideas. Phase for critical study of
the ideas causes produced during the brainstorming
session to identify the best and
most probable ones. These identification can take
a long time as it includes an analysis of
their pros and cons of each of the ideas causes. The process can be
accelerated by a boat of the members for the costs
that they consider important. Experience shows that although this is not very scientific, it works quite well. The leader communicates
to the members their right to vote on
an idea if they wish. You're going to start by
referring to one of the causes, indicating to the members how many of you want to bold
on this idea costs. The result is the
number of bolts is noted on the diagram
next to the idea. This is how the process
continues until all the causes have
been put to the volt. If there are no
bolts for an idea, I put a line through the idea. The causes with the
most votes are cycled. There are usually two at least, and sometimes they
reach five or six, but there is no fixed minimum. The three causes
that have received the highest number
of boats are cycled. When the causes
effect diagram has the most important causes
wrapped in a circle, you can focus on a few causes
which is less confusing. Phase five, run the
most likely causes in order of importance. To do this, look at the
ones that are cycled. Tell members to vote
only for those causes. Sometimes the cost is surrounded by a cycle can become effects. It is not normal to do so, but sometimes circumstances
may advise it. You have to both the number of boats are written
next to each course, at the priority next
to each course. So what discussion of pros
and cons and new boat, sometimes the result
of the boat is displayed in operator table. Phase six, the
most probable cost is examined to verify it. Sometimes it is easy to verify. Other times it's
taken a long time, but it must always be done. The main cause is numbered one. It is the one we want to verify. A brainstorming session
is a good way to do it. Members are asked to present their suggestions on
how to verify it. There is a follow-up to
cause effect analysis. The recommended solution, cost effect analysis makes
it easier to discover, verify the true cause
of the plural name. Now, you can prepare a
recommended solution. Members are encouraged
to identify always ways to
correct the problem. An excellent opportunity for
a brainstorming session. Sometimes we get a
pleasant surprise when something suddenly
takes a positive turn. If we do not find the course, there is a rigs that
everything will return to the way it was before. Use cause effect
analysis to find out the causes of
this good program. Now again, I want to suggest an interesting questionnaire
on this topic that we have just developed
with a series of approach looking for
the correct answer. One, the problem under analysis must be generally
enough to stimulate the attendees and
get suggestions about the possible
causes to be made. Very broadly. It is right or wrong, it is correct or incorrect. It is incorrect. As a rule, it is
advisable to specify the problem to be analyzed
as much as possible. Before proceeding to the
brainstorming phase. In the analysis course
Effect problems. The brainstorming
rules will not only be repeated if new members
or visitors attend. And what do you think? Incorrect? Three, therefore, m's in the cost effect system of Fishbone refers to one manpower, two methods, three machines
and for materials. Is this correct or incorrect? It is correct for
the causes that are suggested must be
related to the problem. Otherwise, it will be better not to include
them in the list. What do you think? This is incorrect? Remember, you have to separate the creative phase from
the evaluative phase. Five, the analysis of
costs effect problems is always carried out under the
direction of the leader. And what do you think? This is incorrect? Another member, if necessary, can momentarily occupy
the position of the leader as a training
system for future leaders. Six, how many causes should be cycled during your study phase? A1, B3. See theoretically unlimited. The correct answer is C,
theoretically unlimited. Seven, the discussion of
the suggested causes can be carried out during a
brainstorming session, be before or after
the boat to determine the main possible causes and see during the
verification phase, the correct answer is B before or after the boat to determine
the main possible causes. The verification phase
in the analysis of course effect problems
is a compulsory, be recommended. See, rarely used. The answer is a compulsory. Nine. Normally the technique that immediately follows
the analysis, of course, an effect problem
is usually brainstorming. Be the control sheet. See the Pareto chart. The correct answer
is a brainstorming, both to verify and to
search for the solution. In the order of priorities, the cost effect
analysis should be developed in A2 Blackboard, be a block CLR sheet
of flip chart paper. D are projector. The correct answer is C, a large sheet of
flip chart paper. What was the result of
this interesting quiz? I'm sure, Very good. Okay.
7. Cause / Effect in Block Process: The block process cause
effect analysis of problems provide an
effective method of reducing this technique. The process analysis is
similar to the basic analysis, but it also has differences. The process take place
in several phases. Phase one is identify the problem as a
currently as possible, as a basic analysis phase to determine the
sequence of the process. It is usually starts
with the first step or block and then
others one-by-one. Sometimes it is can
be easier to start backwards from the problem
backwards in the blocks. An example, being late
for work is a problem. A. The first sequence is AC. We call it Get ready. It includes activities from
waking up to getting dressed. Be the second is called Eat, includes breakfasts, activities. See the third and last
one is called driving, describes the tax from breakfast
until arriving at work. Phase three,
brainstorming session. All members suggest causes. Brainstorming is productive
when the rules are followed. Rotate idea, one
idea per person, no kind of criticism, etc. Once the rules has been
explained, the session begins. The process goes quickly as
a member writes down ideas as they occur under
one of the forams, which are noted on the chart. And in our book. Let's go back to the example. Focus only on the Get
ready block, brimstone, why the person is late for work, then do the same thing
with the heat block. Then the same thing
with driving. When everyone says pass, the brainstorming is over. Phase for the ideas produced
in the brainstorming are criticized and analyzed
to select the best ones. Each cost must be evaluated to quantify it, this takes time. As time is money, scarce, voting, it is fast and
gives impressive results. The leader communicates
to the members that they can vote for
the ideas they want. He points to a cos and ask how many wanted to
vote for this course. The result of boats is
reflected in the diagram. This is how all
causes are voted. If any of them did
not get volts, it will be grossed
out with a line. The most voltage are cycled, usually two or three, but can be more. In this case, the three
most voltage are marked. This is the diagram
with the main causes marked phase five. In this phase, the cost
is studied in phase four are classified in
order of importance. Examine only the ones
inside the cycle. The market causes will be
bolted on the members. Only the marked ones. Record the boat next
to the course voted. Run them according
to the number of bolts are member can interrupt this session to
speak in favor or against both in phase
four and phase five, but never during the
brainstorming session. Sometimes the results are
arranged in a Pareto table. Phase six, the cause
that seems most important is studied to
verify this assessment. We want to verify cos number
one for this brainstorming. Follow up, the recommended
solution brainstorming session to identify
alternative solutions, discuss pros and cons
to find a consensus. They select solutions are part of the presentation
to the management. Things to remember. In brainstorming, concentrate on one group block at a time without trying to jump
from one block to another. How to save time? Is it is obvious that a group of blocks is the origin
of the true costs. Suppose we want to focus
on the IED block only. Faces 45 must be done
concentrating on the same block. The blocks are part
of the sequence, but sometimes they are not. This reflects the
development of the process. Sometimes members one to investigate what happened
between block on lock. For this brainstorming. Finally, indicate the date, name of the leader
or the work team, the topic discussed, etc. Questionnaire. One, the cost effect analysis is equal effective in
its application both administrative and in production,
sales, marketing, etc. Is this right or wrong? This is right. It is preferable not
to allow discussion during the voting process
on the most likely causes. In order not to show this chord, it is right or it is wrong. It is right. Three, the exact
determination of the program subject to analysis is
the task of the leader. Members only participate once the brainstorming
technique has begun. Is it right or is it wrong? It is wrong. For in the cost effect process, identification and sequence
of the blocks proceeded, the determination
of the problem. Is it right or is it wrong? It is wrong. Five, in the development
of the cost effect system, it is not mandatory to
submit each block to a brainstorming session in the same sequence in which
the work is carried out. Is it right or wrong? It is right? Six, discussions of all
the ideas suggested during a brainstorming session
should take the place before or after the boat or not during the process itself. Is it right or is it wrong? It is right. Seven, the cost
effect procedure, while the brainstorming
phase is taking place, the ideas can be directed
towards any existing block. In other words, it is
not necessary to submit the blocks one by one to
the brainstorming session. And what do we think
it is right or wrong? This is wrong. In the cost effect procedure, the brainstorming session is mandatory for all the blocks. Even if the group
is sure to have, to have discovered
the true cost. Is this right or wrong? This is wrong.
8. Presentation to Management: Presentation to management
is a team effort. All half worked on the analysis. Everyone is encouraged to
contribute to the presentation. Communicating is an
essential reason in the presentation
to management. Why not just give a
written recommendation? For the following reasons. One, this may lead to
misinterpretation. It does not have the impact on our face-to-face presentation
in both directions. Three, does not allow adequate
recognition of members. Efforts for our solution
is recommended for the problems that have been previously identified
and analyzed. Use a checklist to make sure
everything is prepared, such as a electric cable
extension, HDMI, etcetera. Be a flipchart. See our projector and a
screen if necessary, D, etc. Starting at the scheduled
time makes a good impression. Half an agenda, a timetable which includes all
the points to be discussed, as well as the names
of those present. Each participant should
receive a copy of that agenda. At the beginning of the
meeting, introduce each member. They should intervene
as presenters, the large number of people, each one must be presented before starting
their intervention. Chart shuts us burrito and
cost effective charge will help you get your message across quickly and make a
good impression. It is preferable to use
the graphs as they are, using the same ones that were developed in the
analysis sessions, as well as being
more comfortable. It asks attached of realism. Presentations can be made
without a special aids, but effectiveness is increased
if certain aids are used, like a flip chart and
overhead projector or TV, significant flip charts sheets
can be fixed to the wall. Alpha cycle member pin them to the wall as you finish
your presentation. They will serve as
a reference for all transform the
words into graphics. And thus, you will avoid
frustrations and wasting time with the public to understand even
better your message. Images are always superior
to mirror written words. Some many graphs and
tables can help you follow the agenda and avoid destructions and
interference if you can, if possible, bring samples on what you are exhibiting
and give them to the public promptly so everyone can see,
touch and examine. Few things are better than
these to clarify a message. Be proud of what
you have achieved. Talked about it, the public
ones to know their success. Thank everyone who has helped with the work of
the quality circle. That's fine. You will be fine. And those who helped you to show your confidence in our ongoing
when, when collaboration. What level of management
shoulder presentation be addressed to the director to
whom the leader's report. Encourage them to ask
you questions to make sure your message
has been understood, or ask yourself to make
sure everything is clear. Oral Expression techniques, public speaking techniques will have to communicate effectively. Don't hide your enthusiasm. Enthusiasm is contagious, and
control your stage fright. A pre-performance. Rehearsals diffuses tension. The stage fright, I'm
paves the way for the performance to run
smoothly and effectively. Remember there is no substitute
for thorough preparation. The presentation to
the management is a splendid opportunity
that the members of the quality circles
have to communicate their ideas and their
results to the management. It is a worthwhile experience for everyone. Questionnaire. One presentation
should be made by a deliver only be the
leader and his deputy. See the leader and his members. The correct answer is C, The leader and his members. It is not necessary to commission a
professional to prepare the graphics to be used in that presentation
to management. It is right or it is wrong. This is right. Three presentations to
management are used to provide recommendations
to management. The reasons may be, Let's think current
situations of a project or maybe a fail for the duration of the presentation
to the management should be preferably a
about three minutes, be 60 minutes, or see
only the necessary time? The answer is C, only the necessary time. Five, determine at least four
kinds of graphs and tables. One pareto to control
sheet, three, cos effect. And for scatter diagrams
six, the original diagram, of course, effect
method is usually very confused during
its development. It is recommended
to clean it up, removing all kinds of confusing
elements that are not necessary before proceeding to present it to the management. Is it right or is it wrong? It is wrong. Seven, the one who
directs the presentation before the management is
always, usually the leader. Is it right or wrong? It is right. Eight, name three methods
in addition to graphs or tables that will help management to clearly understand
the presentation. One product presentation
to photographs, images, free, base
it work area nine. Who should introduce
each speaker before the next intervention? The leader or the
previous speaker, deliver. B, each speaker. C, optional. A, the leader. The presentation
to the management offers the advantage of
being able to invite the highest director
of the company and go directly to him requesting
firewall decisions. It is right or it is wrong? It is wrong.
9. Leader's Guide for the First 10 Meetings of the Quality Circles: I understand that this
may seems redundant, but we must remember
this information. First meeting. Welcome members and guests. If there are any, introduce the facilitator
coordinator and the guests. Explain what the
quality circle is. Communicate what the
organization's goals are when implementing
quality circles. Briefly describe how teams work. Tell members that they will be trained in problem-solving
strategies. And that they will
choose programs from the work area to turn
into teamwork projects. That they will search for answers and they will
offer them to management. Explain what the management
committee is and point out the names of
those who make it up. Explain how the facilitator coordinate will advise
the quality circles. Tell everyone that you are going to get them out of teamwork. Give members some information
about the training topics. Instruct them to understand
the first question. Tell them what techniques they are going to be trained on. Discuss problem prevention. Tell them that at
the next meeting, brainstorming will be covered. And a code of conduct will also be built by
the quality circle. Thank all for their
attention and collaboration. Indicate the day, time and
place for the next meeting. Next time, if you want named
someone to take the minutes. Second minute. Hello everyone. Ask someone to take the minutes, read the minutes of the
previous meeting to approve it, review everything that was
done in previous meetings. Now I explain what
brainstorming is. Emphasize it's important and it is the most used activity
inequality circle. Prepare a flip chart sheet with the title code of conduct. Here are some points that other world themes have included in their codes of conduct. Attend all meetings on time, pay attention and show respect
for the views of others. Make everyone feel
part of the group. Decides ideas, not people. Be very open to the
ideas of others. Maintain a friendly attitude. Look for the married
in the ideas of others to ensure that grade is given to
those who deserve it. Avoid conflicts during meetings, never tried to dominate others. Maintain a friendly
atmosphere at all times. First, look for causes,
then solutions, price progress, no matter
how small, encourage others. Now we'd have to do a
brainstorming the code of conduct, both on the most
important ideas. Following the Voting, the proposal for the
team's code of conduct, our prioritize and listed in a descending order of relevance. Usually a code of conduct
contains about ten ideas. Now we write our new code of conduct on a
flip chart sheet, enlarged letters for everyone
to read from their seats. This code will always appear in public at all quite
a circle meetings. Tell members to
start thinking about the possible problems
in their area of work. Announced the day, time and
place of the next meeting. Thank everyone for their
systems and collaboration. Make sure that someone does the minutes and check
with the facilitator. Third meeting. As always, welcome members and
others attendees, if any, read for approval the minutes
of the last meeting. If they weren't, themes
are solve problems. They need data. Sampling techniques
facilitate obtaining the necessary information
with minimal effort. Begin the process of
selecting an issue for the quality
circle to work on. For example, programs
that prevent or hinder the quality of
management in our work area. For this indication, make
a brainstorming session, indicate the date, time, and place for the next meeting and discuss with
the facilitator. Fourth meeting. Members and guests
if there are any, read the minutes of
previous meetings on submit them for approval. Members should be a
word that much of the data they need already may exist in other departments. We're going to continue
with the process already began in
previous meetings to select a world project for the quality circle if the brainstorming session was completed in previous meetings. Now we are going to choose the problem for the
work team to study. Let's have a boat. Attention. Select
a program that is entirely under george
jurisdiction and jaw control to select
a problem that can be analyzed by the group and
solve relatively easily. And in a few meetings, dry if it is possible to assign tasks to
the group members. Tell them that at
the next meeting, we will talk about decision
analysis using Pareto. Announce the date, time, and place for the next meeting. Thank everyone for
their systems and collaboration and check
with the facilitator. Fifth meeting. Members and guests
if there are any, read the minutes of previous meetings and
submit them for approval. Now introduce the topic of decision analysis using Pareto. The word Teams has to decide according to
the data collected. The so-called
Pareto technique is the one way to make
that decision. With Benito, it is clear
what it is important. Few things are important,
many are trivial. This is going to be seen with the strong visual impact
that palatal provides. That IC, strong visual impact is compelling communication. Say we'll learn how to evaluate the reasons of programs at the next quality
circle meeting. Tell them the day, time, and place for the next meeting. Remember, do not forget to make the minutes
of this meeting. Thank everyone for
their cooperation and check in with the
facilitator coordinator. Sixth meeting. As always, welcome everyone and introduce guessed
if there are any. Take a few minutes
to read and approve the minutes of
previous meetings. Review the Pareto theme, introduced the topic cause and effect analysis in fishbone. With pareto, we have been
able to select the problem, but it must be analyzed
to get the real costs. The grouping of the forams is
not the only possible one. If there is another
appropriate way of grouping eight can be used. Now we're going to
work on the topic chosen as a problem to be analyzed by the
quantity circle. The idea will be to be able to apply the cost effect analysis, but it may not be time jet. In any case, let's
review the work plan that we established
in previous meetings. Say that in the next meeting
we will study the processes, blocks of cause and effect, indicate the day, time and
place of the next meeting. Do not forget the
minutes of the meeting. And if it seems convenient, consult with the facilitator. Seventh meeting, read everyone and read to approve the
minutes of previous meetings. Review the previous topic of basic cost effect
analysis in Fishbone. Now introduce the
topic of this meeting, cos effect process in blocks
and its analysis members that it is a barrier of the basic cost effect analysis that we have already known. Now we're going to continue with the quality circle project. If possible, the analysis
of the process of cause and effect can be applied to the
topic of the quality circle. If not, give a
practical example. If there is not much
time, do it briefly. Say that at the next meeting, we will focus on the
presentation to management. I end as always, by thanking everyone for their collaboration and saying where and when the
next meeting will be. Do not forget the
minutes of this meeting. And also, if you think
it's convenient, command with a facilitator. Eighth meeting,
welcome everyone and reading an approval of the minutes of the
previous meeting. Review of the subject process
causes effects blocks. Introduce the topic
presentation to management. Emphasize the importance
of this communication to the management to
get their acceptance, support, and implementation
of the solutions to the parameters chosen and
analyze by the quality circle. Management will want proof of the necessity of what
we are proposing. Let the members know that they will all take part
in the presentation to the leadership and that they will have time
to prepare well. And how is our product going? Now you can set the date and
time of the next meeting. Thank everyone for
their collaboration and consult with a
facilitator if required. Ninth meeting. All attendees and
introduce guest. Reading an approval
of previous minutes, review the topic
presentation to management, work on the cycle Project, Rebuild the action plan
that was established. Announce the date and time
for the next meeting. Thank everyone for their
presence and collaboration. Somebody prepared
the minutes and command with the
facilitator coordinator. 10th meeting. Welcome. All introduce guessed if any, reading and approval
of the minutes. Work on the group project, review the action plan, and it ends as always, the 10th meeting of the
cycle has been the first which node time has been
dedicated to training. But there is no difficulty in repeating the topics
from time to time. To understand more
and more clearly the problem-solving techniques
of the quality circle. When teamwork has been going for a long time, things change. The structure of the
meeting is simply replace by authentic teamwork. This will also happen
to your cycle. With this, we close the quality circles process
that we allow us to increase our efficiency
until another time. Greetings.