Transcripts
1. Welcome Aboard!: Hi. I'm Danish misha. You'll be hearing this voice
throughout the course, guiding you step by step on your journey to mastering
financial ratios. With years of
experience in finance, I'm here to simplify the
complexities and help you excel. Are you overwhelmed by endless spreadsheets
and struggling to make sense of financial data? Is all this causing you
headaches and stress? Don't worry. I've
got you covered. In this course, I'll
be your mentor, turning confusion into clarity. My reach spans across the globe, and I'm proud to
say that most of my students hail from
the United States. You'll be joining
an international community of learners who are already transforming
the way they understand and manage finances. Don't just take my word for it. Have a look at my reviews. Students rave about the clarity, depth, and practical
approach of my teaching. They've called this
course a game changer for their careers
and businesses. See for yourself why
I'm the go to mentor. My course is your secret weapon. You'll unlock the
ability to understand and apply essential
financial ratios, empowering you to
analyze performance, identify opportunities, and drive success in
your business or career. Here's what we'll cover
profitability ratios, liquidity ratios,
efficiency ratios, leverage ratios,
and market ratios. Every concept is explained with practical examples
you can relate to. Who is this course
for? This course is designed for
students of finance, entrepreneurs, small
business owners, investors, and
professionals looking to enhance their skills. No matter your background, if you're ready to make
informed financial decisions, this course is your gateway. Here's why you should enroll. You'll master financial
ratios like a professional, beat the calculations,
beat the analysis, that would be a piece of cake. You'll build confidence in
your financial expertise, make data driven
business decisions and gain the tools to analyze real
world financial scenarios. Plus, you'll position
yourself for growth and success. So
what are you waiting for? Take the leap today, enroll now, and start unlocking the
power of financial ratios. Your journey to financial
master restarts here. Let's get started together.
2. Introduction to Ratios: Hi, everyone. In this course, we'll explore the fascinating
world of financial ratios, key tools that help
us measure and understand a business's
financial health. So financial ratios are grouped
into five key categories. The first profitability ratios. These ratios assess a
company's ability to generate profit relative to
revenue, assets or equity. Moving on, we'll cover
liquidity ratios. They evaluate a
company's ability to meet their short term
financial obligations. Furthermore, efficiency
ratios, they measure how effectively a company uses its resources like
assets and inventory. Moving on, we'll
cover market ratios. These ratios provide
insights into company's market valuation
and investor perceptions. And finally, we'll conclude
with leverage ratios. They help analyze
a company's use of debt to finance its operations. So, guys, throughout
this course, we'll break down each ratio, explain how they calculate it, and show you how to interpret the results for smarter
financial decision making. So buckle up and see you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
3. Importance of Ratios: Hi, everyone. Welcome to the importance of
financial ratios. Financial ratios
play a crucial role in decision making for
various stakeholders. Let's see why they matter. Number one, performance
evaluation. Ratios provide insights into
a company's profitability, efficiency, and
overall performance. So think of them as a scorecard, helping companies evaluate how well the company is
performing in key areas. Number two, managers can assess whether the business is meeting its financial goals, and how can a manager do that by regularly tracking
these ratios? Managers can see if
goals are being met, and if not, they could
take corrective action. Moving on financial
health assessment. Liquidity ratios like
the current ratio, help determine if a company is able to meet its short
term obligations. So liquidity ratios are
very, very important. We'll cover the current
ratio and quick ratio. They provide a snapshot
of whether a company can pay its short term debts
using its current assets, such as cash, money in the bank, receivables,
inventory, et cetera. Number two, leverage
ratios reveal the level of financial risk
associated with debt. And how is that possible? They show us how much
of the company is financed through debt and how much is financed
through equity. Now, that's crucial for the company's
financial stability, especially in times
of uncertainty. Moving on, investment decisions. Market ratios such as the price earnings ratio
and earnings per share guide investors in evaluating the value of their investments. So these ratios
provide clarity on whether a company is a good investment opportunity or not, whether the company is
overvalued or undervalued, whether the investors
should buy, hold, or sell their stocks. Number two,
investors, obviously, they can use these ratios to compare companies in
the same industry. They allow investors to
compare the value of different companies and decide which company to
allocate their funds. Furthermore, operational efficiency
efficiency ratios highlight how effectively a company is using its resources such as
inventory and assets. For instance, this is
a very important ratio will cover later the
inventory turnover ratio. That shows how quickly a business sells and
replaces its stock, which is key for avoiding
overstocking or stockouts. Also, they help identify areas for cost deduction and
process improvement. Moving on credit
worthiness evaluation, Creditors or lenders, they use financial ratios to determine whether to extend credit
or loans to a company. They can assess
whether the company is a safe bet for loans or not. We'll cover a very
important ratio later on the debt
to equity ratio. Now, debt to equity ratio can reveal whether the
company is over leveraged, which increases the
risk of default, meaning that it's very risky to provide a loan
to such a company. They might not repay the loan. Furthermore, benchmarking
and comparisons, ratios enable
businesses to benchmark performance against competitors
or industry standards. Now, always remember one thing, financial ratios are not just about analysing one company. They allow us to
compute the performance against competitors and
industry standards. For instance, if a company
has a higher profit margin, it may signal better
cost management. They're probably better than us in pricing strategies as well. This helps in identifying competitive strengths
and weaknesses. Like, it could show
us where a company is excelling and where it needs to improve in order
to stay competitive. Finally, strategic planning. By analysing trends in
financial ratios over time, companies can make
informed decisions about growth,
expansion, et cetera. Ratios are not just
tools for the present. Remember that. They can also help guide future
decisions and strategies. Number two, ratios
help prioritize areas for improvement to
achieve long term success. By analyzing the trends
in the key ratios, companies can identify whether they're ready for expansion, whether they require
cost reduction, should they explore new
avenues for investments. Okay? So financial ratios, they act as a roadmap. They would align decisions
with the long term goals to ensure the resources
are allocated efficiently. So, guys, thank you so much. It was a pleasure. I'll see
you in the next video. Bye.
4. What is Liquidity?: Hi, everyone. Today, we would
be discussing liquidity. Liquidity is the ease with
which a company can convert the assets into cash in order to cover short
term obligations. Every business entity, they
have short term obligations. For instance, repaying loans,
repaying your lenders, covering day to day bills, salaries, and other
operating expenses. So how easy or how comfortable or how
convenient would it be for the company in order to utilize all their current assets in paying their short
term liabilities? That's known as liquidity. Now, I mentioned the
word current assets. So let's see how current assets can be used to pay off short
term obligations. Number one, we have cash. Now, cash is the highest or the most liquid asset because it's already in the form needed
to pay your obligations. For instance, if your accounts payable or your lender
visits your office, you can easily give him
the cash you have in hand or any petty cash
you have in your wallet. Second, there's
accounts receivable. Now, this is moderately liquid. So the money owed
to the company by customers for goods or
services provided on credit, receivables are
moderately liquid because they depend on the
customer's payment timing. For instance, if your
customer pays you within 30 days or within 60
days or within 90 days, you would get your cash
after that time period. Then you can use that cash to pay off your short
term obligations. Then we have inventory. Now, inventory is
the least liquid. The reason is because
they must first be sold and even to sell your inventory would
be very difficult. You would have to
market your product, you have to make sure it
has sufficient demand. So there are a lot
of things you have to take into account. So unsold stock may take
weeks or months to sell, and especially if demand is low, then obviously,
you would have to work really, really harder. Now, let's see the importance of liquidity for a business. So first, it ensures
financial stability. A company with
good liquidity can handle unexpected
expenses or emergencies, avoiding disruptions
in operations, helps to maintain
operational flow. So sufficient liquidity allows companies to pay
their suppliers, employees, and
creditors on time. Improves credit worthiness. Remember, a liquid business is more likely to secure loans. The reason is because their financial health is quite strong and they would have
a lower risk of default. Enables strategic opportunities. Liquidity gives companies
the flexibility to seize growth opportunities, such as, you know, expanding, investing in new projects, or acquiring other businesses. Also prevents loss
of reputation. Now, just imagine, for instance, you own a hotel and
different head of states are in the hotel and there's a major
conference going on. All of a sudden, your lenders, the banks, they all start
protesting outside the hotel. They're demanding
to be repaid ASAP. Obviously, your reputation
would be tarnished. So failing to meet financial
obligations on time, it can definitely
damage your reputation and also lead to a lack of trust from all the stakeholders. Right. I'll see you
in the next class. Thank you very much.
5. The Current Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today, we would
cover the current ratio. The current ratio is a financial
metric used to evaluate a company's ability to pay off its short term liabilities
using its short term assets. Now, short term liabilities are also known as
current liabilities. They are debts or obligations that need to be settled
within one year, and short term assets are
also known as current assets. These are assets that
can be converted into cash or used
up within a year. Now, if you still
don't understand the concept of current
assets and curt liabilities, I prepared a beginners
accounting boot camp. The link is in the
description of this video. Right. Moving on, let's see the formula and calculation
of the current ratio. Now, the formula is very simple. It's current assets divided
by current liabilities. Now, let's have a look at the
examples of current assets. Cash is the most liquid
current asset or even bank. That's also the most
liquid asset after cash. Then after bank, we
have our debtors, also known as
accounts receivable. They are also your
current assets, and they are moderately liquid, as we saw in the first video. And stock, your inventory. These are also current assets, and they are the least
liquid because they take the most time to
convert into cash. Now, under current
liabilities, we have loans. We have your creditors, also known as accounts payable, your suppliers to
whom you owe money. They are also your
current liabilities. And any bank overdrafts. Now, bank overdrafts are
basically the extra amount withdrawn from your balance in your account so that
additional amount would have to be
returned to the bank. Now, let's have a look at
an example and let's see. So example is current
assets are worth $55,000. Current liabilities
are worth $35,000. Now, let's just apply
this in the formula. Current assets divided
by current liabilities. So 55000/35000, you get 1.57. Okay? Now, what does this 1.57 tell us?
Let's have a look. So 1.57 means that for every $1 of short
term liabilities, the company XYZ
limited they have 1.5 $7 in assets to cover
the short term liabilities. So this seems
pretty good, right? You have $1 of debt, and in order to pay it, you have 1.5 $7 in
current assets. So this is generally considered healthy
because the company has enough short term assets to pay the short term debts with some cushion and in their
comfort zone as well. Now, let's see something else. Let's interpret the results. So if your current
ratio is more than two, that's considered
as extremely high. Now, it seems
pretty good, right? Your answer is very high. You have a lot of assets,
but that's not the case. Maybe you have so much unsold
inventory that's being rotten in your warehouse and that's being included
in your answer. And maybe you're only
selling on credit. So because of a lot
of receivables, that value is being reflected
in your current ratio. Or, you have too much cash. Now, holding too much
cash is not a good thing. You could invest that somewhere, or you could pay
dividends with that. And if your current ratio is less than one, that's
very dangerous. You have to worry
about that because this would signal potential
liquidity problems. Probably you have
low cash inflows, probably there's no
demand of your products. They're not being sold and your receivables are
not paying on time. Probably your credit
control is very poor. Now, what's the
ideal current ratio? Sorry. Ideal current ratio
would be around 1.5, like 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, up to 1.5, that would be
the ideal current ratio. This means that the company is efficiently using the assets in order to generate returns. If they have extra cash, they're investing it somewhere. They're not holding
too much inventory. They're not selling
all goods on credit. They have good credit controls. However, before I
conclude the class, you must remember that the current ratio would depend
from company to company. Like, the ideal current ratio
can vary by the industry. For example, companies in industries with longer
product cycles, they might have lower
current ratios. While service companies,
they might maintain higher current ratios due
to lower inventory needs. See you guys in the next
video. Thank you very much.
6. The Quick Ratio: Everyone. Today, we
would cover quick ratio. Now, quick ratio is also
known as asset test ratio. It is a more
stringent measure of a company's liquidity
than the current ratio. So in the quick ratio, we focus on the quick assets. They are the most liquid assets. So the least liquid assets are inventory and
prepaid expenses. So let's see why do we remove
inventory from the formula? Well, number one, there's
no guarantee of sale. You bought products
for resale purposes, but obviously, there's
no guarantee, right? I mean, you bought something. What if it doesn't get
sold due to any reason? The second reason is
demand can change. Demand is not fixed. Preferences and tastes and
habits constantly change. And if they pull away from you, then obviously your
products wouldn't be sold. The third reason is selling inventory requires extensive
marketing strategies. You would have to offer
discounts, promotions. You have to look at
your pricing strategies and many other factors. And lastly, returns
are extremely common. If you sold something
to a customer, he claims a refund, you would have to give
all the cash back. And if you sold on credit, the customer returns
the product, so he would not get
any cash in return. So these are all the reasons why we have to remove inventory. But why do we remove prepaid
expenses from the formula? Well, first, understand
what are prepaid expenses. So prepaid expenses,
they represent payments made for goods or services that would be
received in the future. For example, if you pay insurance premium for the entire year at the
beginning of the year, you could use the services and indemnify yourself
for the entire year. So if you pay advanced
rent for the entire year, so you could use
the property for the entire year without
paying monthly rentals. So let's have a
look at the reasons why we remove prepaid
expenses from the formula. Well, lack of
immediate cash value. So prepaid expenses
represent a future benefit, not cash or an asset that can be quickly
converted into cash. For example, if a company has prepaid insurance
for the year, that amount cannot be sold or liquidated to
raise cash quickly. It only represents an amount the company will
use in the future. Secondly, it's a totally
non liquid item. So liquidity refers to how easily an asset can be
converted into cash. Prepaid expenses are
typically not liquid because the benefit from
them is realized over time. Lastly, no impact
on debt repayment. Quick ratio aims to determine
whether a company can meet their short term obligations using the most liquid assets. Since prepaid expenses aren't available for use
in the short term, they are totally excluded from the quick
ratio calculation. And guys, most commonly, just think about
something pretty obvious. In the event of a
liquidity crisis, would prepaid expenses help you? No, because they don't
generate immediate cash. Right. Now, let's have a look at the formula and calculation. So the formula is current
assets minus stock or inventory minus prepaid expenses divided by current liabilities. The entire numerator, you
could just write quick assets. So we took all the
quick assets on top. For example, let's say your current assets
are worth $42,000, inventory worth $20,000,
prepaid expenses, $2,000 and current
liabilities, $23,000. So let's solve the
question. We would write current
assets minus stock, minus prepaid expenses divided
by current liabilities. So 42,000 -20,000
-2000/20 $3,000, the answer you get is 0.87. Wow, that's less than one. So 0.87 means that
the company only has $0.87 in quick assets for every dollar of
current liabilities. This is a very
dangerous situation. They don't have
enough liquid assets to cover the short
term obligations. Now, let's interpret the values. Now, if your answer is
more than one, two, three, four, five, whatever, that's
the perfect situation. This means you have sufficient liquid assets to cover your short
term obligations. This is a sign of
financial stability. Secondly, if you're one. If your answer is one, that means you're in a
break even situation. Now, this is also an
alarming situation. You are in the
borderline of disaster. So this means that
your company just has enough quick assets to cover the short term liabilities,
you have to work harder. But if you answer
is less than one, then I would say rest in peace. This suggests that
the company does not have enough quick assets to cover the curt liabilities, and this could indicate a potential liquidity issue and it could also
lead to bankruptcy. So, guys, thank you
so much for watching. I'll see you in the next video.
7. The Gross Profit Margin: Hi, everyone. Today
we are discussing the gross profit margin.
Let's get started. The gross profit margin is a financial metric that
shows how efficiently a company produces goods
or delivers services while controlling its
production costs. It represents the
percentage of revenue remaining after deducting
the cost of goods sold. Now, I want you to understand
what is cost of goods sold. When a company buys
inventory to resell, what's the cost of
all those items? It could, like, for example, if you're selling ice cream, so what's the cost of
producing that ice cream? If you're selling furniture, what's the cost of
buying that furniture, the cost of the sofas, the cost of the beds, the cost of the chandeliers, the cost of the decoration. What's the cost of the
items we are reselling? Or if you're
producing something, what's the cost of
producing those items? We only focus on the
direct expenses. We totally ignore all
indirect expenses that are not related
to the product itself. Okay? So in cost of goods sold, we focus on inventory
alone, nothing else. Everything related
to the inventory would come in the
cost of goods sold. So in order to enhance
your understanding, I prepared an
example, the person you see on the screen is Sara. She runs a small
ice cream parlor. So let's see her financials. She sells an ice cream for $5, and the cost of milk
was $1 per ice cream. The cost of a cone was
$0.50 per ice cream. Cost of sugar was $0.50
per ice cream as well. Cost of culling agents
was $0.30 per ice cream. And finally, cost of ice cream essence was
$0.40 per ice cream. Remarkably, at the
end of the day, she sold 30 ice cream cones. So if I ask you calculate
the gross profit. What I'm asking you
calculate that level of return she gets after deducting
all her direct expenses. So the answer would be $69. And how did I get $69? Sarah sold 30 ice creams. She sells one ice cream
cone for $5, multiply both. Add up all the cost
of the ingredients, multiply it by 30 ice creams, so you'll get your direct costs. So $69 is the profit
left by Sara. Now notice something. We did not account for any
expenses such as rent. What's the rent of
this ice cream parlor? Any discounts given to customers at this
ice cream parlor. Any electricity costs involved. And if she hired a
few other workers, their salaries are
also not involved. And if she delivers ice
cream to her customers, the delivery is not involved. We only accounted
for direct costs. This is the gross profit. So now let's see the
formula of gross profit, and we would see what
does the $69 show? Right. So the formula would
be gross profit divided by sales multiplied
by 100. Very simple. Now we'll use the same values
from the Sara example. So she earned a
gross profit of $69. Her revenue was $150. Multiply by 100, you get 46%. Her gross profit margin is 46%. Now, let's interpret this. This means Sara retains
46% of her revenue as gross profit after covering the direct costs of
producing ice cream. In other words, we can also
say from every $1 of revenue, $0.46 or $0.46 is
a gross profit. Also, from every $1 of revenue, 54% is her direct costs, her cost of production,
or cost of sales. Okay? So this is the profit
she earns after deducting all her direct costs involved in her ice cream or involved
in her inventory, okay? So I hope you understood
the gross profit margin. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
8. The Net Profit Margin: Hi, everyone. Today
we are discussing the net profit margin.
So let's get started. The net profit margin is a
financial ratio that measures how much net income or profit a company generates as a
percentage of its revenue. It indicates the
efficiency of a company in managing its expenses and
earning profits from its sales. So first, let's understand
what is net profit. In the previous lesson, we
discussed gross profit. So in the gross profit, we only subtracted
all our direct costs, all costs relating
to inventory only. However, in the
net profit margin, we subtract all
expenses, all costs. We subtract all outflows. We don't care if it's related to the inventory or
if it's indirect, as well. We subtract everything. So net profit is basically how much are you taking
back at home? How much return are you
generating from the business? So the ratio is a percentage just exactly like the
gross profit margin. Let's look at an example. A similar example from
the previous lesson, we discussed Sara
selling ice cream, but the values are
slightly modified. Let's assume her sales for
the month were $1,000. She earned $1,000 in the
month by selling ice cream. And all her direct costs, meaning all the ingredients
to produce the ice cream. That amounted to $300. When I mean direct costs, I mean the cost
of the inventory. So that was $300. Now there are other costs that are not relating
to the ice cream, but they are costs
of the business, costs to run the business. For example, electricity. That's a very important cost. She probably has
lights over here, and at night, she
would use them. So that's $100. She probably
hired some helpers, some workers, some sales staff, so she pays them $250. Obviously, marketing is the
backbone of a business. Without marketing, how would customers know what
she's selling? So that costed her $100, and delivery to customers
costed her $110, right? So these are all the
expenses of Sara. Now, if I ask you, what's the net income, we would subtract cost of
sales and expenses from sales. So we got $140. This is the net profit. In other words, you
could also write gross profit minus
expenses because sales minus cost of sales is
your gross profit anyway. So you could just write
gross profit minus expenses, but obviously, to deepen your understanding, I
made it easier for you. Now, let's put all this in a formula So the formula is net profit divided
by sales into 100. Now, again, putting
all in the formula, she earned net profit of $140, revenue of $100
multiplied by 100. So 14% is her net profit margin. Now, let's interpret this 14%. This means that Sara
retains 14% of her revenue as net profit after deducting all expenses
and direct costs. So if you multiply
14% with the revenue, you'll get your net profit. So 14% times 1,000
would be $140. In other words, Sara is
taking $140 back home. That's her return
on her investment. Alright? Also, we could
also put it this way. 86% of her revenue is all going in her costs
and her expenses, right? And only 14%, like a
small slice of the pizza, she's taking back home. This is the net profit margin. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
9. The Return on Equity: Hi, everyone. Today we are discussing a very
interesting ratio, the return on equity. Now, what's equity?
Let's have a look. Shareholders equity is the residual interest
or ownership stake of shareholders in
a company's assets after deducting all
the liabilities. In other words, it represents the net value of a company that belongs to
its shareholders. Now, I want you to
understand equity basically means how much stake do
you have in a company? How much percentage ownership
do you have in a company? You have an interest
in the company. You have something to gain. If the company goes
well, you'll gain. If the company goes
down, you'll lose. So you have a residual
interest in the company. Now, there are many things that make up the
shareholders equity, but the most important things, let's have a look at the
most important things. The first thing is
the share capital. Now, Share capital
basically represents the money generated by a
company by issuing shares. For example, if the share price is $1 and the company
issued 10,000 shares, so $10,000 generated
is your share capital. Retained earnings, that's also a very important part of
the shareholders equity. Retained earnings
represents the profit reinvested by the company
into the company. So, for example, if the
company earned, let's say, $100,000 profit, they
paid interest tax, they even paid dividends,
so they got $60,000 left. That's what they
reinvest in the company, so that's retained earnings. A premium is very important.
That's a reserve. So basically, SA premium represents the excess money
earned by issue of Shas, for example, if the
shape price was $1 and all of a sudden
due to high demand, the share price became $5. So the difference
between $1.05 dollar, old money generated at
the new Share price, that is called SA premium. Also other reserves,
for instance, there's the general reserve. There's the foreign
exchange reserve. There's the capital
replacement reserve. There's devaluation reserve. Reserves have one
purpose only to save the company in uncertain
and difficult times. Or if the company wants
to keep money aside for some specific purpose
or any general purpose, so that's where reserves
come into play. So all these elements are part of the
shareholders equity. And you can find this in the statement of
changes in equity. This is where you'll find
the equity of shareholders. And remember, this
is never fixed. This constantly changes. Equity can go up. If
the company does well, equity can go down if the
company performs poorly. All right? Now, let's have
a look at the formula. Before we move on
to the formula, let's see what is the return on equity ratio? What
does it show us? So return on equity means how well is the
company generating profit by utilizing the funds of the shareholders? Now
think for a moment. You invest your money somewhere. And that company would use that investment for business and hopefully generate
profit, right? So your money is being
used to generate profit. Won't you question the company, how are you using my funds? How well are you doing? Obviously, because
your money is at stake and your money is
being used for business. So this is exactly what
return on equity means. It means, how well is the company making the most of the shareholders
investment? This is what the return
on equity shows us. Now, let's have a look at
a comprehensive example. The formula for return on
equity is very simple, net profit divided by
shareholder's equity. And when I mean net profit, I mean the profit after
interest and tax. When you get your
operating profit, you would subtract
any interest paid, subtract the tax paid
to the government, then you get your
profit for the year. Or also known as net profit. This is the value we
use in the formula. Now, let's say I
look at an example. Let's say profit before
interest was $100,000. The interest expense for
the year was $1,000. Tex was $2,000, and Shareholders'
equity was $450,000. Now let's put this
in the formula. So we will use the profit
after interest and tax value divided by shareholders equity,
multiplied by 100. So in order to get the
profit after interest, we have to obviously
subtract the interest and tax from the profit
before interest. That's exactly what
I did over here, $100,000 minus
$100, minus $2,000. Shareholders equity is
given divided by $450,000, then we'd multiply by 100. We get 21.56%. 21.56%. Now, let's interpret this. What what does this mean? So 21.56% basically
means that from every $1 of shareholders equity
invested in the company, 0.21 $506 are made in profit. Okay? So this is what the
return on equity tells us. Right? Now, when we
compare companies, the answer sometimes
can be very misleading. Perhaps, they could be companies that are
more reliant on debt. Their debt is more than equity. Now, because the equity is low, obviously, the denominator
in the formula would be low. So overall, your
answer would be high. So sometimes the answers
could be very misleading. You have to make sure
that you compare companies with similar
debt to equity ratios. Their reliance on equity
should be similar. The nature of company
should be similar as well. So that way you could get a more accurate representation
of the return on equity. See you guys in the next
video. Thank you very much.
10. The Return on Assets: Everyone. Today,
we're discussing another very interesting ratio, known as the return on assets. Very interesting.
So let's degrte it. Return on assets is a financial
ratio that measures how efficiently a company uses its total assets to
generate profit. So basically, in this ratio, we are comparing our assets with our net income because obviously
assets in the business, they are used for production. They're used to add value. They have some use in
the business which directly or indirectly
helps to generate income. So in this ratio, we are going
to see how efficiently are the assets being used and how effective are they in
generating net income. So before we move on, there are some very
important considerations. Many people get confused that what value of our assets
do we take in the ratio? So let's have a look. The first important consideration
you should know is that always the non
current assets would be taken at the netbook
values in the formula. If they're tangible assets, we would subtract depreciation. If they are intangible assets, we would subtract amortization. So it's very important to take them at the netbook values. Another very important
factor are your receivables. They should be taken at
the net values as well. Now, what do I mean
by the net value? I mean, you have to
subtract any provision for doubtful debts or any
unaccounted bad debts. We would have to subtract
all those values, then we would use the net value. Another important factor
is that in this ratio, we don't select non
current acids only. We take all our assets, current and non
current, we don't mind. And lastly, we don't
consider liquidity. In the liquid ratios, especially in the quick ratio, we subtracted inventory
and free payments. We don't subtract
anything over here. We don't consider liquid
and iliquid assets. We take all of them. Now, let's have a look at
the formula straightaway. Net profit divided by your total assets
multiplied by 100. And again, when I
say net profit, I mean the profit after
interest and tax. So you would subtract any interest and tax from
our operating profit, then the profit for the year would be used in
the calculation. Now, let's have a
look at an example. Let's say the profit before
interest was $100,000, interest expense for the year, $100, tax payable, $2,000 and total
assets worth $350,000. So let's put all the
values in the formula. Profit divided by your total
assets multiplied by 100. So again, we would subtract our interest tax in the numerator and divide
by our total assets, 350,000 multiplied by
100, we get 27.7%. Now, let's try to interpret
what 27.7% is trying to tell us means that from every $1 of assets
invested in the business, from them, 0.27 $7 are being
converted into profit. This is quite a
good ratio, okay? 0.27 $7 of property is being
made from our $1 of assets. Now this ratio can also become misleading when we compare
assets of different companies. Like certain companies,
they have heavy machinery. They have lots of non current
assets such as airlines, technology and massive
manufacturing units. Now, because they
have numerous assets, their return on
assets would be low because the denominator
would be extremely high. So it's very
important to compare companies that have
similar asset levels. They are in similar stages of production to ensure that
your ratio is not misleading. Other important
consideration is if you compare the return on
assets of older companies, their assets would be lower
because of depreciation. They would have charged a lot of depreciation
and amortization, but this is not the case
with newer companies. So it's also very
important to compare companies that have been
established in similar years. Lastly, another very
important factor is that if you're running a new business and it's the first year
of your operations, obviously, you did not yet
charge any depreciation. So because of no depreciation, your total assets
would be higher and your return on assets
as a result would be lower. So it's very important to account for all these
factors before compaing your return on
assets to ensure you get a more accurate
picture of your company. Thank you very much. I'll
see you in the next video.
11. Earnings before Interest, Depreciation, Taxes & Amortization (EBIDTA): Hi, everyone. Today
we are discussing a key ratio called IBITA.
So let's get started. IBTa is also known as
earnings before interest, tax depreciation,
and amortization. So this is a measure of a company's profitability that focuses on the core operations. All effects that are non operational and non
cash, they are removed. So this gives a clearer
picture of how well the business is generating
profit from its operations. Now, why do we remove interest tax depreciation
and amortization? Let's have a look. Let's
focus on interest first. Now, understand
what is interest. Interest expense is related
to how a company is financed. Is it financed through debt or is it financed through equity? Since it reflects the
company's financing decisions, it's not part of the co
operational performance. So removing interest allows
the company to see how well they operate without
the influence of its capital structure. Secondly, taxes. Now, taxes are paid to the government based on
a company's profits, and the tax liability
is influenced by the company's tax policies,
jurisdiction, and location. Removing taxes, Abeta provides a clear picture of how well a company performs from a
purely operational standpoint, without any influence
from tax laws. Thirdly, depreciation. Depreciation is a
non cash expense. It does not affect the company's actual
cash flow in reality, so it's excluded from IBITA. This allows for focus on operational profitability rather than accounting
conventions. Now, if you still don't
know why is depreciation, I made a comprehensive
and detailed course with 100 practice questions, one practice test,
and seven sections. So I'm going to share the link in the description
of this video. You can access that course. Lastly, amortization. Now, amortization is
exactly like depreciation, but it applies to
intangible assets. That's also a non cash expense. It does not affect
the actual cash flow, so that's removed
from the formula. So basically, all these
expenses that you see, they are not the true
expenses of a company, which is why they are removed
from the formula to give a more reliable estimate to give a more clear picture of the actual financing
of a company. Moving on, let's
see the formula. So Ibita is equal to net
profit plus interest plus tax, plus depreciation and
plus amortization. Now, why do we add
everything in the formula when it clearly states before interest, depreciation
tax, amortization? The reason is net profit is your final figure after
subtracting everything, your expenses, interest tax. So we have to add
everything back so the value becomes zero and they're officially
removed from the formula. Since everything is subtracted, so it's a mathematical rule, minus plus is equal to zero. So in order to
remove everything, we have to add everything back. So we remove everything from
the accounting records. Now, let's look at an example. Profit after interest is
$100,000 interest, $1,000, tax $2,000, depreciation,
$30,000, amortization $10,000. So in order to calculate
the IBITA it's very simple. You have to just
add everything up. So that's exactly what I did, and I got $143,000. Now this $143,000 gives a clearer picture of the
company's operating performance. All the financing
items, the tax items, non cash items, they're all
removed from the value. So now, this is a more
reliable estimate. It represents my true expenses. It represents my true
core performance items. So I hope you understood Abita. See you in the next video. Thank you very much.
12. The Inventory Turnover: Hi, everyone. Today we are
covering inventory turnover, a very important ratio.
Now what's inventory? Inventory are the
products bought for one intention only,
and that's reselling. So inventory turnover is a financial ratio that
measures how often a company sells and replaces its inventory
during a specific period. It is an important ratio for
evaluating the efficiency of a company's inventory
management and its ability to convert
inventory into sales. In a nutshell, inventory
turnover is an indicator of how well a company manages its inventory in
relation to sales. Now, if your product
is highly demanding, it would get sold in seconds. The shelves would get empty. People will come
again and again, so your turnover would be high. On the other hand, if your
product is not so demanding, people don't prefer
buying your product, so you won't have to replace
the shelves very often, so the turnover would be lower. Now, why is inventory
turnover important? Well, first, cash flows. A high turnover means
inventories being sold quickly turning into cash. Obviously, your liquidity
position would become great. Then cost efficiency. Efficient inventory
management can reduce costs related to storage,
insurance, and spoilage. It allows companies to invest
in faster moving inventory, which could improve
profitability. Final point, a well managed
inventory system often correlates with
higher profits as it ensures that inventory
is fresh and in demand, minimizing markdowns or wastage. Moving on, let's
see the formula, cost of goods sold divided
by average inventory. Now, cost of goods sold is the cost of selling
your inventory. Whatever products you are
stocking up in the shelves, what's the cost of those items? So this consists of
opening inventory, the inventory that was unsold
in the previous period, what's the cost of those items? Then you bought more inventory. What's the cost of those items? Then we subtract
closing inventory. We subtract closing inventory because as the word says,
cost of goods sold. Closing inventory are
the unsold goods, so we don't include
that in our cost. Average inventory
is the averages of your opening and
closing inventory. Okay? So opening plus closing,
divided by two. Let's have a look at an example. Let's say a company has cost of goods sold worth $1 million, opening inventory
worth $200,000, closing inventory
worth $300,000. So let's put this
in the formula. We get 1000000/200000 dollars plus $300,000 divided by two. So the answer we get is four. Okay? So we would present
it this way four times. This means the company
sold and replaced its inventory four times
during the period. Right? Now, how do we know what
are the implications of a high inventory turnover or a low inventory turnover?
Let's have a look at this. Well, if your inventory
turnover is too high, so presumably, it means you
are doing a very good thing. Your inventory is being
sold quickly, efficiently. People love your product. It can suggest strong sales, effective inventory
management, and a lower risk of holding
obsolete inventory. Now, high inventory
turnover is very common for businesses
like retailers because high turnover
is usually a good thing for them as it indicates
their products are in demand. Secondly, if your
turnover is low, this could indicate poor sales, overstocking, low demand, inefficient inventory
management, and all this could increase
your inventory costs. Now, a low turnover
could also indicate that the company has
too much inventory and it struggles to sell it all. Now, companies in
industries with seasonal sales cycles or luxury goods may naturally
have lower turnover. This is what's the
important part. A business which has a low inventory turnover does not mean that
that's a bad business. If I talk about luxury goods, the turnover won't be
as fast as a retailer, like if there's a
business selling jets or selling aeroplanes. Now, it's very the time period where airlines place their
orders is not so frequent. For example, Emirates Airlines of the United Arab Emirates, they place their orders
for the next ten years. So now for the next ten years, Boeing wouldn't get more orders. So if you invent
turnover is low, this does not mean
you're a bad business. You must compare your business with a business in
the same industry. Otherwise, your results would be misleading. See you
in the next video. Thank you very much.
13. Receivable days: Hi, everyone. Today
we are discussing a simple and interesting ratio, known as the
receivable days ratio. It's also known as days sales
outstanding ratio, DSO. So let's have a look
what this is all about. Receivable is your
credit customer to whom you sold
goods on credit. Now he owes you money. Okay? The word receivable is linked with the
word received. You have to receive
money from that person. Now, receivable days calculation measures the average number of days it takes a company to collect the payment
after a credit sale. It helps to assess how quickly a company collects
cash from customers. So this is totally contingent
on your credit control, on your credit policies, on your communication
with your receivable. Now, let's have a look at
the formula. Pretty simple. We have our average
receivables divided by credit sales multiply
by the accounting period. If it's a year, then
multiply by 365. If it's months, then
multiply by 12, if it's weeks, then
multiply by 48. Now, average receivables, that
means your opening balance of your receivable plus the closing balance of
receivable divided by two. The reason why we take the
average is because this includes the entire movements that happened in your
receivable account. Everything would
be accounted for if you take the average of both. Now, let's have a
look at an example. Let's say your credit
sales are $600,000, opening account
receivable $90,000, closing account
receivable, $110,000. PDD is 365 days. Now, let's use the formula, average receivables, divided by credit sales, multiply by 365. So let's take the average
of the receivables. So $90,000 plus 110000/2 divided by 600,000 of your credit sales, then multiply by 365, you get 61 days, right? So this 61 days basically
means that the company takes approximately 61 days to collect payment
after a credit sale. It takes them 61 days to receive payment from
the credit customers. No, how do we interpret this? How do I know that is
the 61 days good or bad? Is it slow or quick? Is it efficient or inefficient? How do I know that? So you have to focus on
your credit terms. Credit terms is the agreement your company makes with
the credit customers. For example, if the
company agreed that the customers should pay
within 60 days after a sale, then 61 days is not
bad. That's fine. However, if the credit
term agreed is 60 days, but the ratio is 90 days, it means that your
customers are taking a very long time to
pay you the money. It's not good. This could create a liquidity crisis because you're not receiving cash
from your customers. You provided a service
or you sold goods, but you're not getting
cash in return, so that could be
problematic for you. It would be a hassle for
you to maintain day to day operations of your
company because there are many expenses you have to pay
many obligations to meet. But if your customers
are not paying you cash, that could become problematic. Right. See you in the next
video. Thank you very much.
14. Payable Days: One. Today we are discussing
the payable days ratio. It's very similar to
the previous ratio we discussed receivable days
ratio. So let's begin. Now, who's your
accounts payable? Accounts payable is
your credit supplier. You bought goods on
credit from him, now you owe him
money or you took services from someone and
you are yet to pay him. The word payable and
pay are interlinked. Now, payable days measures the average number of
days a company takes to pay its suppliers after purchasing goods or
rendering services. This metric helps assess the company's payment efficiency and how it manages cash flow. Now the formula is very simple. You take the average payables divided by the cost of sales. I'm sure you know what
the cost of sales now, the direct cost of
your inventory, the inventory you are selling, the inventory you're selling, what's the cost of those items. Then multiply by 365. So again, average is the opening balance of your payable plus closing
balance divided by two. Example, let's say the cost
of goods sold is $800,000. You opening balance is $50,000. Closing balance is $70,000, and you have a 365 day period. So let's put it in the formula. So we would take the average $50,000 plus $70,000
divided by two. Cost of sales is given in
the question, $800,000, multiply by 365, then
you get 28 days. This means the company takes approximately 28 days on
average to pay their suppliers. Again, how do I know I
this 28 days good or bad? There are two
things. Number one, you can compare with
your competitors. What is the payable day ratio? But most commonly,
if you want to be very efficient and smart, you have to look at the credit terms given
by your supplier. Let's assume the agreement
with your supplier was that you have to
pay within 60 days, but you pay in 70 days. This suggests the company
is taking longer to pay. This may improve
cash flow, however, it could definitely
strain relationship with your suppliers because
you're taking longer to pay. However, if the payable
day ratio is 40 days, this seems very good, right? But that's not the case. Definitely, it's an indication that the company's paying
supply is quicker. Also, supply relationships
could be very good. However, this means the company isn't fully using
the credit period. If your supplier gave
you a 60 day period, then pay within 60 days. Who cares about
supply relationships? The main thing is your business. Nothing is more than that. If you have any extra cash, that could be
invested somewhere, and it could generate returns. So it's always better to
pay your supplier within the credit term he gave
you and try to do it as close towards the
deadline as possible. Right, guys. I'll see
you in the next video. Thank you so much.
15. The Working Capital Turnover: Everyone. Today we are discussing another very
interesting ratio, the last of the
efficiency ratios, the working capital turnover. Before we begin, let's try to understand what is
working capital. So working capital is
linked with liquidity. It's a financial
metric that represents the difference
between a company's current assets and
current liabilities. So that's your liquidity. That liquidity would be used to meet short
term obligations, to meet operational
expenses as well. So obviously, the higher
working capital you have, the easier it will be for you to fulfill all these
short term obligations. So the capital required for
the day to day operations, that's known as working capital. Now, let's see why is working
capital important right. So the first is liquidity. Now, there's a
difference between positive working capital and
negative working capital. Positive working capital is when your current assets are more than your
current liabilities. Negative working capital is when your current liabilities are more than your current assets. So liquidity. Remember, positive working
capital ensures that the company can meet all their short term obligations without relying on any
external financing. Second, operational efficiency, efficiently managed
working capital, supports smooth operations and avoids unnecessary
cash shortages. Growth potential. Companies with strong working capital can
reinvest in their business. They can purchase
extra inventory and, of course, take advantage
of growth opportunities. Risk indicator. Now, if you're having a negative
working capital overtime, this could definitely
signal financial distress. It would make it
harder to secure loans or attract investors. Coming back to the
working capital turnover. Now, this is a ratio that
measures how efficiently a company uses its working
capital to generate revenue. So basically, we are trying
to study the relationship between your sales and
your working capital. Let's have a look at
the formula now we take the net sales divided by the
average working capital. Now, when I say net sales, I mean you have to remove any discounts given
to the customers, and you have to adjust any
returns by the customers. Now, again, in the denominator, I wrote average working capital, so we'll add the
opening working capital plus the closing working
capital and divided by two. So when I say working capital, it's simply your current assets minus your
current liability. So let's look at an example. Let's say your net
sales are $1 million. You opening working capital is $200,000, 500,000
minus $300,000. Your closing working
capital is $250,000, which came by subtracting 600,300 $50,000 off
your liabilities. So let's put this
in the formula. Net sales divided by
average working capital. So your net sales
are $1 million. Your average working capital
would be 200,000 plus 250000/2 you get 4.44 times now, what does this 4.44 times mean? This means the
company generates 4.4 $4 in sales for every
$1 of working capital. Now, exactly like liquidity, it would be interpreted
the same way. If your working
capital is too high, then it means that you're
holding extra cash, you're holding extra
current assets, which could be used
in a better purpose. It could be more efficient,
and if it's low, then obviously that could
signify a liquidity crisis. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
16. The Debt to Equity Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today, we are discussing a very
important ratio, the debt to equity ratio,
let's get started. So the debt to equity ratio is a financial metric
that evaluates the relationship between a company's total debt
and shareholder's equity. So this ratio basically studies how much of the
company's operations are financed by borrowed funds, the debt versus the owner's
investment, the equity. It's an important measure of a company's financial leverage
showing how much debt is used to finance operations compared to the owner's
invested capital. So basically, this ratio reflects the company's
risk profile and financial stability. Companies with
higher debt are seen as riskier due to
repayment obligations. Let's move on and
see the difference between debt finance
and equity finance. So debt finance debt finance refers to borrowing money that must be repaid with interest. So for instance, the
company approaches a bank, they could approach
bondholders or creditors, and all money borrowed
from them would be repaid with a premium
known as interest. On the other hand,
equity finance is when a company issues
shares or stocks, and that's how they raise money. That's known as equity finance. Secondly, debt finance lenders do not gain ownership
in the company. They are simply creditors, okay? They are people to whom
the company owes money. They don't gain any ownership
or stake in the company. On the other hand, equity
holders or investors, they become partial owners. So the company
gives away shares. Those shares are part
ownership of the company. So whoever holds the shares, they become part
owners of the company. Thirdly, debt finance requires fixed repayment of
principal and interest. So regardless of the
company performance, this is a payment
obligation that has to be done on
a periodic basis. However, in equity finance, there's no repayment obligation. The only thing that investors return return are dividends
or capital gains. So dividends are basically
like profit shares they attain on the basis
of the number of shares they subscribe
in the company. Capital gains refers to the appreciation in
the shareholder value. The price of the share or
stock increases with time. Fourthly, there's no
impact on company control. So basically, the ownership
dilution is not there. The control is not diluted or the ownership is
not diluted either. However, in equity finance, this may reduce control
as shareholders, they gain voting rights. They gain ownership,
they gain voting rights. Now obviously, as investors,
you're investing your money, so you have a say in
the company if you own common stock or ordinary
shares. Right, moving on. Let's see the interpretation
of the debt to equity ratio. So basically, a higher ratio suggests that the company
relies heavily on debt. This means that it could lead to higher
profits during good times, but increases financial risks, especially if the company
faces cash flow issues. On the other hand, a
lower ratio implies that the company has a conservative
financial strategy. They're relying more on equity. This could prioritize
stability and lower risk. Now, let's have a look
at the calculation, the formula of the
debt to equity ratio. So we take the total
liabilities and divide by total
shareholders equity. Right? So total liabilities are both your non current
and current liabilities. On the other hand, your
shareholders' equity, they include your share capital, meaning all money raised by the company when they
issued shares or stocks, and all reserves are also
added in shareholders' equity. So reserves are basically
when the company, they put aside an amount for a general purpose or
for a specific purpose. This includes many reserves, for example, the
general reserve, retained earnings,
revaluation reserve, capital replacement reserve, foreign exchange reserve
even share premium. So all those reserves would be added in shareholders' equity. We take our total liabilities, $500,000 and the shareholders
equity, $250,000. So we'll apply this
in the formula. $500,000 divided by
$250,000, we get two. Okay? Now we should understand
what does this two mean? It means company A has a
debt to equity ratio of two. This means it uses $2 of
debt for every $1 of equity. Now, this means that the debt is double the amount
of the equity. So the company is
significantly leveraged. This could increase
profitability for sure. However, financial risk could also increase in case
of downturns. Right? Let's have a look at
some general guidelines. If your debt to equity
ratio is lower than one, that's an extremely
safe situation. There's minimal
debt obligations. This prioritizes stable, long term growth over
rapid expansion, and this would be more appealing to
conservative investors. On the other hand, if
your ratio is 1-2, that's the moderate category. And this is a balanced approach. This could enable growth while
keeping risks manageable, and it indicates effective
capital structure management. However, if your ratio
is greater than two, then that means
you are using debt aggressively to finance
growth or operations. No. This could lead to a higher profit potential during good economic situations. However, it could expose the company to significant
risk during downturns. And most commonly, the
construction industry, real estate, and
manufacturing industries fall in this category. Right. See you all the next
video. Thank you very much.
17. The Debt to Ebdita: Hi, everyone. Today, we are discussing another
very important ratio, the debt to BITA ratio.
Let's get started. So the debt to IBITA
ratio measures a company's ability to pay off its debt using its IBITA
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
and amortization. Now, I made a video
on bita in detail, so I'm not going to
go in detail today. You can watch that
video in this course. It shows how many times
it would take for the company to pay
off its debt if its BITA remains constant and all earnings are
used for repayment. So the purpose is to evaluate the financial leverage and repayment capability
of the company. It helps determine if
a company's debt level is sustainable
compared to its BITA, a very, very important
ratio. Right. Let's move on. Let's have
a look at the formula. We take the total debt. Now, when I say total debt, I mean it's a short term and long term debt,
divide by BITA. Okay, so your
current liabilities, your non current liabilities, everything comes
under the total debt. Now, let's have a
look at the formula. Total debt is $1.5 million. IBITA is $500,000. So put in the formula, divide by IBITa, you get three. Now, it's very,
very important to understand what does
this three mean? It means the company's debt is three times larger
than the IBITa. So for every $1 of BTA
the company earns, it has $3 in debt. So the debt is extremely larger than the capacity
of the company. Now, some people also say
this is another opinion. They say that the company
would approximately take three years to pay
their debt from IBITA. Now, why do they say this? They say this because the BTA, the value is for one year only. So when I divide the debt
by the one year amount, the answer I get
represents the time. So if I pay my debt
through my IBITA, it would take me three
years to cover my debt, $500,000 in the first year, $500,000 in the next year, and $500,000 in the third year. Now, this opinion, in
my personal opinion, it's not so credible. The reason is we
can't assume that the BITA would stay fixed
and constant every year. It would fluctuate. It could go up, I could go down as well. So saying this that it
takes three years to pay, this is not so credible
in my personal opinion. Like, let's move on. Let's
interpret the values. If your debt to BITA ratio is less than three,
then that's normal. It indicates that
the company has a manageable level of debt
compared to its earnings, and it suggests strong
financial health and a lower risk of default. If the ratio is
greater than five, then you should start praying
to God that God helps you. It indicates a
high level of debt relative to earnings which could increase chances of default. It is a situation of distress, financial distress
and a danger zone. Right. Now, this was the
debt to IBITA ratio. Now, always, I want you
to remember one thing that you can't rely
on one ratio alone. You have to see
many other ratios. Now, this ratio also
has its pros and cons. This does not include
capital expenditures, right? And a company with high EBITA, but poor cash flow may still struggle
to service its debt. This does not include
cash flows only. It's very important when you
use the debt to bita ratio, you must compare with
the same industries. All right? So that's
it for today. I'll see you in the next
video. Thank you very watch.
18. The Interest Coverage Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today, we are
discussing another key ratio, the interest coverage
ratio. Let's get started. So the interest coverage ratio measures a company's ability to meet its interest
payment obligations using its operating profits. So basically, the purpose
is to evaluate how comfortably a company can handle its debt related
interest payments, which is a critical indicator
of financial health. Moving on, let's have a
look at the formula now. So we take earnings
before interest and taxes divided by the interest
expense for the year. Now, you might be wondering, why do we take earnings before interest and taxes? Well,
it's pretty simple. The entire ratio we are
studying right now, interest coverage, we
are trying to see, do we have sufficient profit, sufficient earnings to cover
our interest obligations. This is why we take the
profit before subtracting interest because interest is the main principle over here. Secondly, interest and taxes, they don't represent my
core business activity. They're not involved
in my core operations. They are fixed obligations. They're not part of
my general expenses, so we have to subtract it, meaning, remove it
from the formula, add it back to attain
the correct value. Right. Now, interest
expense for the year. Is our interest
obligations for the year. The total expense payable,
which includes accrued. For instance, the loan
payable is $100,000, and the interest expense
is 5% per annum. So if I multiply
5% with $100,000, I have to pay this $500 every
year as per the agreement. This is the interest
expense for the year. Let's have a look at
an example, right? Earnings before interest
and taxes is $500,000. The interest expense
is $100,000. So we take earnings
before interest and tax divided by interest expense. Now it's very, very important. I want you to
understand something. In order to remove
this $100,000, what should I do? Nothing. I won't do anything
because the value I got, that's already before
interest and tax. I wrote the interest expense
only to confuse you. If I wrote earnings
after interest and tax, then I would add back $100,000
in order to make it zero. So we divide this by interest
expense for the year. We got five. Now it's
very important to interpret what does an interest coverage
ratio of five mean. So it means that the company's earnings
before interest and tax can cover the annual interest
expense five times over. This means that the company generates enough
operating profit to comfortably meet
its interest payments multiple times in a single year, leaving it with
significant profit remaining for other purposes. Okay? Now, this indicates
strong financial health. It means the company
has enough earnings. They could easily meet
the interest obligations. They can even paid
five times in a year. They have so much profit. But let's move on and
see the interpretation. If you have a higher ratio
which is above two or three, this suggests that the company earns significantly more than
its interest obligations, and it has a strong
financial position. If your ratio is below one, it obviously means you do not have enough earnings before interest to cover your
interest obligations. And obviously, you have to
go for external funding. And when you borrow
external funding, your interest
obligations would also increase causing you
significant financial distress. And there would be
a high probability of default on loans. Right. So, guys, that's it. I'll see you in the next
video. Thank you very much.
19. Long Term Debt to Capitalization: Hi, everyone. We are
covering a key ratio called the long term debt to capitalization ratio.
Let's get started. So the long term debt to
capitalization ratio measures the proportion of a
company's long term debt relative to its total
capitalization, which includes both
debt and equity. So long term debt are basically your long
term liabilities, your long term obligations that you have to repay after
a very long time. And they are used for extremely
significant purposes. For instance, if
a company intends to buy an expensive
non current asset, they tend to expand, they tend to penetrate
into a new market. So the finance generated, the liability generated for that purpose is your
long term debt. Capitalization refers how
a company finances itself. So it provides insights
into how much of the company's funding comes
from long term borrowing. You all might be wondering, why do we ignore
short term debt? And in this entire ratio, why are we focusing on
long term debt only? The reason is very similar. So short term debt is temporary, and it's used to address
working capital needs, the operating expenses and obligations for day
to day purposes. So short term debt is
not so significant. On the other hand, short term liabilities, they
fluctuate frequently, and they may not provide an accurate picture of the company's long
term financial health. Now, long term debt reflects fixed oblig so they will stay on the balance
sheet for several years, providing a stable
measure of leverage, which is why we focus
on long term debt only, and we ignore short term debt. So let's have a look
at the formula. We take the long
term debt divided by long term debt plus
shareholders equity. The numerator
represents the debt. The denominator represents
the capitalization. Now you might be
wondering why am I adding long term debt
in the denominator. Again, the reason is that this represents the
total financing pool. The denominator reflects
the total funds available for the
company's operations. You know a company can finance
through debt or equity. So both are financing options. So that's the total
capitalization. Right, let's have a
look at an example. A company has long
term debt worth $1 million and shareholders
equity worth $2 million. We put in the formula
divided by $3 million, $1 million plus $2 million. That's $3 million
multiply by 100, so we get 33.33%. Now, very important to
understand what is the 33.33%. It means that 33% of the company's total
capitalization is financed through
long term debt, while the remaining
67% comes from equity. So this indicates a low level of financial leverage and a strong reliance on
equity financing. This minimizes financial risk. Now, let's interpret
the answers. If your answer is less than 50%, that's a normal safe ratio. It indicates less
financial risk. The company relies more
on equity than debt. The balance sheet would look stronger due to a higher
proportion of equity. Shareholders may see
this as positive because the company
has less debt burden. On the other hand, if your
ratio is greater than 50%, then that shows
higher financial risk because the company
carries more debt. However, you'll find
leverage for growth. If managed well, this reliance on debt can enhance
the returns on equity because the
company is using borrowed money to fund
growth opportunities. This may create potential
investor concerns as well. High debt levels might
deter investors or lenders if they
feel the company's financial position is too risky. So, guys, I'll see you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
20. Earnings Per Share: Hi, everyone. Today we are covering a very important
valuation ratio, the earnings per share.
Let's get started. So what is EPS? Earnings per share is a key financial metric that shows how much profit a company generates for each
outstanding share of its common stock
or ordinary shares. Now, outstanding share basically means the number of shares that have been issued out of the authorized share capital
to the general public. In this case, in EPS, we only deal with the
ordinary shareholders. Now, who are the
ordinary shareholders, we'll see in the next slide? It's a crucial indicator of
a company's profitability, and it's often used by
investors to assess a company's financial health
and potential for growth. So earnings per share basically shows the
potential of the company. When we divide the earnings
with the number of shares, we are basically trying
to show the investors that what is the potential for each shareholder
in this company. Investors would use
the EPS to gauge a company's profitability and compare it with competitors
in the same industry. The EPS helps assess how
well a company is utilizing its resources to generate profits for shareholders, right? Very, very important for growth potential and
financial stability. Now, before we move on, it's very important
to understand the difference between the
ordinary shareholders and the preference shareholders
because I told you that the earning per share is only for the
ordinary shareholders. Why is that the case? For that, we have to see the
difference between both. So the ordinary shares are
also known as common stock. In the previous slide, if you so I wrote in the third line, generates for each outstanding
share of its common stock. So ordinary shares are also
known as common stock, and preference shares also
known as preferred stock. So the ordinary shareholders, they're entitled
to dividend after the dividends are paid to
the preference shareholders. Now, the word preference basically means that the
preference shareholders, they have a prior
right for dividends. They are entitled to
a fixed dividend. If something would be left, then that would be distributed to the ordinary shareholders. Ordinary shareholders
have a lower claim on the assets and earnings. On the other hand, the
preferentihareholders, they have a higher claim on
the assets and earnings. If the company decides to
wind up its operations, so the company's priority
would be to repay the outstanding capital to the preferentiaholders by
disposing of the assets first. If something would be left, then that would be given to
the ordinary shareholders. Ordinary shareholders have voting rights and
preference shareholders, they do not have voting rights. So preference
shareholders, basically, they're given a fixed
dividend every year. That's going to be fixed. But
the ordinary shareholders, their dividends are variable. Sometimes they would
get dividends, sometimes they
wouldn't get dividend. They could get a higher
dividend or lower dividend based on the voting in the
annual general meeting. Now if I show you the formula, we take the profit
after interest and tax and subtract
preference dividends. The reason why we subtract
preference dividends is because we are seeing the earning potential for
the ordinary shareholders. The first priority,
the first obligation is to pay dividends to the
preference shareholders. After that, what's the
potential of the company? So in order to find
that potential, we have to first get rid of
our obligation by paying the preference dividends and what's left would go to
the ordinary shareholders. Divided by outstanding
ordinary shares. Outstanding ordinary
shares are the number of ordinary shares issued to
the ordinary shareholders. Now, let's have a
look at an example. A company has net income. Net income is your
profit after interest and tax worth $1 million, preferred dividends of $100,000 and SAS outstanding of 500,000. Now, let's put this
in the formula. The net income is $1 million, subtract the preferred
dividends of $100,000 divided by
500,000 ordinary shares, we get 1.8 dollar per share. Now, very important to understand what
does this 1.8 mean? It means that the
company earned 1.8 $0 of profit for each outstanding
share of common stock. So basically, we divided the profit with the number
of ordinary shares issued. So this shows the earning
potential of the company, what is available for the
ordinary shareholders. That's $1.80. So
always remember, if we interpret the EPS, a high earning per share suggests that the
company is highly profitable and generates
substantial income per share. However, if there's a low EPS, that would indicate a
lower profitability or higher costs
relative to revenue. Probably the expenditures
are too high, revenue is too low. Very important when
you compare companies, you should see that
their style is the same, their way of doing
things is the same. If you're comparing a
company that has not issued dividends with a
company that issued dividends, obviously, the earning per
share wouldn't be reliable. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
21. The Price to Earnings Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today, we
are discussing one of the most important
ratio in my course, the price to earnings
or PE ratio. Let's get started. So the
price to earnings ratio is a common use metric to assess the valuation of a company
relative to its earnings. It helps investors determine
whether a company's stock is overvalued or
undervalued compared to its earnings potential. So basically, it represents
the amount investors are willing to pay for
each dollar of earnings. I prepared a scenario
which would help you understand why using the price to earnings ratio is important. So let's assume
you decide to buy this beautiful red apple or
this beautiful green apple. These are the two
options you have. The red apple costs $5, and the green apple
costs you $4. Now, obviously,
from the naked eye, you would assume that the
green apple is cheaper. The green apple would give you more value because obviously
it's costing you $1 less. But you know what?
That's not the case. The price is a very
basic decision. Price gives you very
limited information. You have to look at
various other factors to decide whether a product is giving you more
or less value. So let's assume the weight
of both apples are the same. 80 grams. They weigh
80 grams respectively. However, there's some
important information, which could be very useful. Let's say the sugar content
in the red apple was 10 grams and the sugar content in the green apple was
6 grams, right? Now, this is very
useful information. For a moment, just imagine that this sugar content is the
earnings of the apple, right? So what if I divide the price
with the sugar content? Price of apple divided
by the sugar content. So for the red apple, I get 0.5, and for the
green apple, I get 0.7. So this basically means
I am willing to buy 0.5 dollar for every 1 gram of sugar content
in the red apple. The other hand, I'm
willing to invest 0.7 dollar for every 1 gram of sugar content in
the green apple. So based on this, you can clearly see
that the red apple is actually cheaper because I'm willing to invest less for more sugar content or
for more earnings. This is exactly what the price to earnings ratio tells us. How much are you willing to invest for every $1 of earnings? If you're investing
less for more earnings, obviously, that is going
to be cheaper for you. Or, in other words, that's
going to give you more value. So let's have a look
at the formula. Take the price per share, divided by earnings per share. Now, in the previous video, I discussed earning
per share in detail. You can watch that video
before watching this video. But for those who
did not watch it, we take the net income minus preferentis divided by the
number of ordinary shares. So let's look at an example. Let's assume a company
has the price per share of $100 and
earnings per share of $5. So when you divide
both, you get 20. Now, this 20 means
that the stock is trading at 20 times
its earnings. Me as an investor, I'm willing to pay $20 for every $1 of earnings in the
company. All right? Now, let's have a look at
a more practical example. Let's say this is Dos limited, and this is MOS limited. So the SHAP price
in Dosited is $60, and earnings per share is $3. In Mosited, the
share price is $75, and earnings per share is $5. So obviously, a layman
would think that Dosited is cheaper because
the share price is low. So obviously, investing
in Dosimited would be more cheaper for you and
it would give you more value. But again, I told you, price is a very basic factor. Price does not give you the entire information you require. So what we can do is we can divide the Sha
price and the EPS, so we would get the
price earnings ratio. So $60 divided by $3, I got 20. And for MOS limited, $75 divided by $5, I got 15. So now you can clearly see
that the price earnings ratio of Msimited is lower than
the price earnings ratio. Of DoS limited. Even though
the share price is higher, the earnings per
share is higher. Now, let's dig more deeper
into the price earnings. For Dosimited, the
price earnings is 20. This means me as an investor, I am willing to pay $20 for every $1 of earnings
in DOS limited. The other hand, in Moss Limited, I'm willing to invest $15 for every $1 of earnings
in the company. So if you look at Mosited, it's actually
cheaper because I'm investing lesser, isn't it? I'm investing less
for more earnings. So investing in
Mossimited would be a better choice based on the
price earnings ratio, right? Right. Moving on, if you
go to yahoo finance.com, there are many, many websites, but I prefer Yahoo Finance
because it's a very simple. So you can see this is the price earnings ratio of
McDonald's Corporation 25.73. Now, what is TTM
trailing 12 months? I'll explain at the
end of this video. So 25.73 basically means
me as an investor, I'm willing to pay 25.7 $3 for every $1 of
earning in McDonald's. Right? Right. Now, let's see the pros and cons of a
higher price earnings ratio. You might think that
that's expensive, that's bad. No,
that's not the case. Both have the pros and cons. So, most importantly, a high PE ratio indicates
bullish behavior. A high PE ratio often
indicates that investors, they expect strong
future growth. They have confidence and optimism about the future
prospects of the company. However on the other
hand, it could indicate a stock is overvalued
and overvalued stocks, they have a lot of
expectations on the company. Shareholders, investors, they
have a lot of, you know, expectations that the
company would grow a lot. So it's very risky. What if the company
does not fulfill all those expectations and all the growth prospects don't be fulfilled?
That's very common. On the other hand, let's
have a look at the pros and cons of a lower
price earnings. So a lower price earnings means that the stock is cheaper. For you, it's undervalued. And value investors, they love low PE ratio stocks because they prefer buying stocks
at a discounted price, hold the stocks, and when
the price goes higher, then they would sell the stocks. However, if you look at the cons of a lower price earnings ratio, a low price earnings
ratio might indicate low confidence,
bearish behavior. Also, there could be a potential reason why is the
price earnings ratio low? There could be problems what you're overlooking
financial problems, operational problems, liquidity problems,
management issues. There could be some problems. Why is the price
earnings ratio low? Finally, there are types
of price earnings ratios. First, there is a trailing
price earnings ratio. In the picture you saw
TTM trailing 12 months. This basically means the
price earnings ratio is based on the company's
past 12 months earnings. There's a forward
price earnings, that's based on the
estimated future earnings. There's Schiller price earnings, that's based on the
average inflation adjusted earnings over
the past ten years. See you all in the next
video. Thank you very much.
22. The Price to Sales Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today, we're
discussing the price to sales ratio, PS ratio. This is extremely similar to the price to earnings
ratio. Let's get started. The PS ratio measures
how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar
of a company's revenue. This is also a valuation ratio, exactly like the price
to earnings ratio. In the PE ratio, we compare price
with the earnings. In this, we compare
price with sales. The formula is very simple, market price per share, divided by revenue per share. Now, what is revenue per share? You take your total revenue divided by the number
of outstanding shares. Outstanding shares
means the number of shares issued to the public. Now, for example, total
revenue is worth $500 million. Total outstanding
shares are 50 million, and the market price
per share is $50. So we'll take the
market price per share, divided by revenue per share. Market price per share
is already given. In order to calculate
the revenue per share, we'll take the total revenue, which is $500 million, divided by the total
outstanding shares, which is 50 million, so
we'll get $10 per share. Now, we'll divide both
and we'll get five. Five basically means that
investors are willing to pay $5 for every $1 of revenue
the company generates. Now, as I told you, this is exactly like the price
to earnings ratio. A lower ratio would suggest that the
company is undervalued, a higher ratio would suggest that the price is overvalued, but the interpretation would
be slightly different. So let's have a look
at the pros and cons of a higher PS ratio. Right? The first reason is
the pro of a higher PS ratio, it indicates strong
growth potential. So basically, a high PS ratio often suggests that investors anticipate significant
revenue growth in the future. That's
a very good thing. Secondly, market confidence. This could reflect strong
investor confidence in the company's
future prospects. And obviously, factors
like a strong brand, competitive advantage or favorable industry outlook
could support this. Then higher margins
are expected. A high PS ratio can
indicate that investors expect the company to generate high profit margins
in the future. Now let's have a look at the
cons of a higher PS ratio. Obviously, there's a
risk of overvaluation, and if the company fails to meet the high expectations
of investors, its stock price could
decline significantly. Secondly, this entire ratio
ignores profitability. This is the price
to sales ratio, and a company with a high PS
ratio may not be profitable, or its profits may be low
relative to its revenue. Lastly, market volatility. So companies with
high PS ratios are often more susceptible
to market volatility. It's because the stock
prices are more likely to be driven by
investor sentiments, and that could fluctuate. Right? Now, let's have
a look at the pros and cons of a lower PS ratio. So first, it indicates
undervaluation. A lower PS ratio might
suggest that the market is underestimating the
company's true value. Now obviously, this
could be cheaper for investors who want to buy
stocks at a discount. Secondly, it could be
a safer investment because companies
with lower PS ratios, they often have established
revenue streams. Thirdly, focuses on
revenue stability. So a lower PS ratio indicates
that investors are more focused on the company's
revenue stability rather than its profitability. No, this can be
beneficial for companies and industries with
high growth potentials. Then let's have a look at the
cons of a lower PS ratio. When a stock is undervalued, it could signal that the market expects low future
growth for the company. It could be due to
various factors such as increased competition, changing demand, et cetera. Then possibly poor
profitability, a lower PS ratio
might indicate that the company has low
profitability margins, and it could be a concern. And obviously, a lower
PS ratio can make a company's stock price more susceptible to
market fluctuations. Right. Now, let's have a look at the comparison of the PS
ratio and the PE ratio. So the PS ratio
focuses on revenue, totally on revenue, and the
PE ratio focuses on profit. The PS ratio can be used
for companies with losses. However, for the PE ratio, that requires
positive net income. Thirdly, the PS ratio is less affected by
profitability margins because profit is not
taken into consideration, but PE ratio is
extremely sensitive. A, a minor change in profit could result in a major
change in the PE ratio. Lastly, the PS ratio ignores
costs and profit margins. However, the PE ratio can be distorted by
accounting choices. Like there are certain
one off expenses such as the cost
of restructuring, the cost of impairments. Taxation policies. Now, those one off expenses, they could significantly distort your PE ratio because they
affect the profitability. That's it for
today. See you guys in the next class.
Thank you very much.
23. The Price to Book Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today we are
discussing another key ratio, the price to book ratio. We saw the price
to earnings ratio. We saw the price to sales ratio. Today we are seeing the
price to book ratio. These are old valuation ratios. They help in the valuation
of the stock or the company. Right. What is the PB ratio? The price to book ratio is
a financial metric that compares the stock price
to its book value. Book value means the
net asset value. What is the net assets, your assets minus liabilities? Again, this helps investors evaluate whether stock is
undervalued or overvalued, and it's particularly useful for companies with significant
tangible assets, such as banks, real estate,
and manufacturing firms. So the PB ratio basically gives investors an
idea of how much they're paying for each dollar
of a company's net assets. For example, let's
see the formula. We take the market price per share divided by the
book value per share. Now, book value per share means the total net assets divided by the number
of outstanding shares. Outstanding shares are
the shares issued, and net assets are assets
minus liabilities. Let's look at an example.
For company ABC, the market price
per share is 25. The book value per share, sorry, market price per share is 50, and book value per share is $25. So we'll take the
market price per share, divided by book value per share. $50 divided by $25, we got five now, what
does this five mean? It means that investors
are willing to pay $5 for every $1 of net
assets the company owns. Okay? Again, I'm telling you, again, again, this is
the valuation ratio. So obviously, the lower it
is, it means it's cheaper. The higher it is, it's
going to be expensive, but we have to look at
the context as well. Both low and high always
have the pros and cons. Now, let's have a
look at the pros and cons of the PB ratio. So the PB ratio is very simple and easy to
calculate and understand. It's useful for evaluating companies with
significant sorry, significant physical assets, such as real estate, machinery. It's also helpful in identifying undervalued or
overvalued stocks. One problem is that it doesn't
account for intangibles. Now, intangible assets
are very important, such as the brand
name of the company, patents, copyrights,
they're all intangibles. So the PB ratio totally
disregards them. We only look at tangible
assets, not intangible assets. Secondly, it's limited and it's only relevant
for certain companies such as technology or manufacturing firms
with heavy machinery. Lastly, it's not a
profitability measure. It doesn't directly measure profitability, doesn't
measure revenue. It only accounts
for the net assets. So, guys, essentially, the
PB ratio gives a snapshot of a company's asset value
relative to its market price. But remember, it has
limitations as well, especially for companies with
strong intangible assets. See you on the next video.
Thank you very much.
24. The Price to Cash Flow Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today we are discussing the price
to cash flow ratio. We saw the price
to earnings ratio, the price to book ratio, the price to sales ratio. Today we'll see the price to cash flow ratio. Let's begin. Now, what is the price
to cash flow ratio? The price to cash flow
ratio is a valuation metric that measures the
market's valuation of a company's
operating cash flow. Now, we focus on the
operating cash flow. Operating cash flow
refers to the cash flow generated from the core
operating activities. If I run a school, then the cash flow earned from the school fees would be
the operating cash flow. If I run a furniture business, then the proceeds I receive from the selling
of the furniture, that would be my
operating cash flow. So we don't consider
other cash flows, such as investing cash flows. If I made investments, then the returns I generate, no. We only focus on the
operating cash flow. Now, this is ideal for industries with high
cash flow generation, such as energy companies, utilities companies
or retail companies. And if a company's
earnings are highly volatile due to non cash items. So for instance, if
there's a company that produces heavy machinery
like Boeing and ABS. So obviously, their aircraft would be subject to
severe depreciation. So in order to find
a credible estimate, it's better to use the
price to cash flow ratio because we remove all non cash items
such as depreciation, we add them back. Right. Now, let's see the formula. We take the market
price per share, divided by the operating
cash flow per share. So it's divided by the number
of outstanding shares. So I told you this
operating cash flow represents cash generated
from co operations. So we divide that with the
number of outstanding shares. For example, company XYZ, the market price per share is $50 and the operating cash
flow per share is $5, so we divide them $50
divided by $5, we get ten. Now, what does this mean? If
I invest $10 in the company, I'm willing to pay $10 for every $1 of cash the company
owns, operating cash flow. Now, let's have a
look at the pros and cons of the price
to cash flow ratio. So first, it's less
susceptible to manipulation, like this does not
consider profit. It only considers cash flow. So if I recognize
incoming revenue, revenue earned in the future, if I recognize that now that's
sort of a manipulation. But in the price to cash flow, we only focus on cash. It's useful for companies with high non cash expenses and avoids impact of
nonrecurring expenses. These nonrecurring expenses are one off expenses, for example, restructuring costs,
impairments, taxation, gain or losses on disposal. These are all nonrecurring, so it avoids the impact
of all those expenses. However, if we look at some cons of the price
to cash flow ratio, it totally disregards
profitability. Even revenue. This only
focuses on cash flow. It does not account for debt. Now, debt is a crucial element that's also known as cash flow
from financing activities. So in this ratio, we only focus on the
operating cash flow. So one problem is that it does not account for the interest payments
that are going. Those are also cash outflows, but it totally disregards them. Also, it's not ideal
for companies with a low cash flow or
negative cash flow. So for them, they would
have to use another ratio, probably the price
to earnings ratio. So see you next video.
Thank you very much.
25. The Price to Growth Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today
we are starting the price earnings to growth
ratio, the PEG ratio. So let's get started. What is PEG ratio? The PEG ratio is a
valuation metric that adjusts the price to earnings ratio for
the growth rate of a company's earnings. It aims to provide a more complete picture of
a company's valuation by factoring in its expected
earnings growth rate rather than just focusing. Hi, everyone. Today
we are starting the price earnings to growth
ratio, the PEG ratio. Let's get started.
What is PEG ratio? The PEG ratio is a
valuation metric that adjusts the price to earnings ratio for
the growth rate of a company's earnings. It aims to provide a
more complete picture of a company's
valuation by factoring in its expected
earnings growth rate rather than focusing on
its current earnings. So whatever ratios we
studied up to now, the price earnings ratio, the price to sales ratio, the price to book ratio, the
price to cash flow ratio, they all focus on
the present data. This ratio focuses on
your expected earnings, on your expected forecasting. So this is pretty
useful for investors. Let's have a look
at the formula. We take the price earnings ratio divided by the
earnings growth rate. The earnings growth
rate is basically the expected annual
growth rate in earnings, typically over the
next five years. This is expressed
in a percentage. So for example, you
can see company X. The current share price is $50. The earnings per share is $2.5, and the expected earnings
growth rate is 20% per year. So let's apply this in the
formula. The PE ratio is 20. The earnings growth rate is 20. We ignore the percentage. Now our answer is one. Now this is a pretty
good estimate one. Let's have a look at
the interpretation. So if the PEG is exactly one, this suggests that the
stock is fairly valued. It suggests that the stock Nah, if your PEG is exactly one, this suggests that
the stock is fairly valued relative to its
expected earnings growth rate. So for example, if a
company has a PE ratio of 20 and is expected to
grow its earnings by 20%, the PEG would exactly be one. In this case, the stock's price seems to reflect its
expected growth potential. If your PEG is less than
one, that's undervalued. This could indicate
a buying opportunity if the company is expected
to grow at a strong pace. For example, if a company
has a PE ratio of 15, but is expected to grow
earnings by 20% annually, so the PEG ratio would be 0.75. This suggests that the
stock's price may be lower than what its
projected growth justifies, making it a potentially attractive investment
opportunity. And if the PEG is more than one, the stock price
might be too high compared to the company's
future growth prospects. So for instance, if the PE ratio is 30 and is expected to
grow earnings by 20%, the PEG ratio would be 1.5. Now, this indicates that
investors might be paying a premium for the
company's expected growth, and the stock price
may be higher than its actual growth
potential warrants. So this was the interpretation
of the PEG ratio. Uh, PEG ratio helps
investors consider a company's growth prospects alongside its current valuation. However, always remember
one thing, guys, it's important to note that the PEG ratio relies on estimates of future
earnings growth. Now obviously, everyone would present a misleading,
a beautiful picture. They would embellish
their forecasting, which can be uncertain. I hope this explanation
is helpful. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
26. Market Capitalization: One. Today we are
discussing market cap, also known as market
capitalization. Let's begin. Market capitalization refers to the total value of all outstanding shares
of a company's stock, which is a reflection
of the company's size, financial health, and
investor sentiment. Now, I told you this many times that outstanding shares of a company basically means the number of shares issued
to the general public. So it is a commonly
used metric to categorize companies and
assess their market value. Now, obviously, the more stocks or more shares a company issues, the more capital they generate, which is also known
as share capital, the higher share
capital a company has, it reflects the strength, size, and financial
health of the company. Now let's have a
look at the formula. We take the share price and multiply with the total
number of outstanding shares. So share price multiplied by the total number
of shares issued. So having a look at an example, company ABC, the
share price is $100. They issued 1 million shares, so we multiply $100
with 1 million, we get $100 million. This is their market cap or
their market capitalization. Let's interpret the market cap. So a small market cap could be around $300
million to $2 billion. A medium cap would
be $2-10 billion, and a large cap would
be above $10 billion. And any market cap
below $300 million, that's known as micro cap. So this is the different
interpretation. Now, let's have a look at the
importance of market cap. First, company size
and stability. So market cap directly reflects a company size.
Always remember that. Larger the market
cap, that indicates a bigger company
with more resources and a stronger
financial position. Obviously, it would
have stability as well. Risk assessment. So market cap can basically help
assess investment risk. Higher market cap companies are often considered
less risky due to their established position and financial strength.
Investment Strategy. So basically, there are
two type of investors, growth investors and
value investors. So investors may use market cap to categorize
companies as growth, meaning they have
a high market cap. They have a potential for
future growth or value, low market cap
undervalued assets. Then mergers and acquisitions. So basically, market cap plays a role in merges
and acquisitions. Companies with high
market caps may be attractive acquisition
targets for larger companies. So, guys, that's it. I'll see you in the next
video. Thank you very much.
27. Enterprise Value: One. Today we are discussing enterprise value,
also known as EV. So let's have a look
what is all this about. So enterprise value basically represents the total value of
the company you're buying. It represents the
theoretical takeover price that an acquirer would pay. So it accounts for a
company's debt, cash, and other financial obligations, providing a clearer picture
of its financial standing. Let's have a look
at the formula. So in order to calculate
the enterprise value, we take the market
capitalization. We add the total debt, and we subtract cash
and cash equivalents. So this would be the entire
value of the company, the price I'll pay
to buy the company. Now, let's look at two things. First thing, market
capitalization, we covered that. Total debt, you know,
what's total debt. So basically, this refers to the entire capital
structure of the company. Whenever a company
raises capital, it could be either
through equity, which represents the
market capitalization, or it could be
through debt finance, which which represents
the total debt. So, number two, why do we subtract cash
and cash equivalents? Why? You might be wondering why subtract cash and
cash equivalents? What's the logic? Now, I'll explain with a scenario
made by myself. Now, let's assume that you intend to buy a
house, all right? You intend to buy this house
which is worth $100,000. Fine. Now, when
you buy the house, you are buying all the
belongings in the house, right? Whatever is in the house,
that will be yours. However, what if when I
was buying the house, the owner told me
that there's a safe, a secret safe, which
has $10,000 cash. What do you think
I should do now? Should I just take that cash? Is that included
in the price I buy the house or should
I subtract this $10,000 from $100,000 and pay $90,000 to the owner and take possession of the
house? What should I do? I would do the second thing. Okay? So what I would do is I would subtract this $10,000, use it as a discount
in the price. I would end up paying $90,000. So basically subtracting cash from the enterprise
value is like taking away the extra money
in your pocket before figuring out the true value
of a house you want to buy. It helps us focus on
the value of the house itself and not get confused
by the extra cash. The reason why we subtract the cash is if I don't
subtract the cash, I would add the cash, right? I could either add something
or subtract something. If I add the cash, it means the value of the
house would be 110,000. But that's baseless, right? Because there's
cash present there, which belongs to
the previous owner, so it's my right to
subtract that in the value of the house
so I could use the cash. This is why we subtract cash in the enterprise value formula. Let's have a look at an example. If a company has a market
capitalization of $1 billion, 500 million in total debt, and 100 million in cash. So what we would
do is very simple. We take $1 billion. We
would add the debt of 500 million and subtract
the cash of 100 million. So we'll be left
with $1.4 billion. So $1.4 billion is the cost to acquire
the entire company. This is enterprise value. See you in the next video.
Thank you very much.
28. Enterprise Value to Sales Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today we are starting the enterprise
value to sales ratio, EV to sales ratio.
So let's degrade. So the EV to sales ratio is a key valuation
metric that helps investors understand
how much it would cost to acquire a company
relative to its revenue. It shows how many times a
company's annual revenue you'd be paying to acquire it. So for example, an EV
to sales ratio of three means you'd be paying
three times the company's annual
revenue to buy it. So this ratio is particularly useful
for valuing companies, companies which have no or very low profit
margins, for example, startups or high
growth companies or those companies in
the early stages of development and may
not be profitable yet. This helps investors determine the value of a company
based on its revenue, especially when profitability is not a significant factor. Let's have a look
at the formula. So we take the enterprise value. We covered this in
the previous video, divided by sales. That's it. So let's assume a company has the following financial
details, market cap, $100 million, total debt, $200 million, cash, $50 million, and the total revenue
is $100 million. So in order to calculate
the enterprise value, we take the market cap, add the total debt, subtract cash. So that would give you the enterprise
value, $650 million. This is your enterprise value. Now, divide this with sales. So 650000000/100000000,
you get 6.56 0.5 X, 6.5 times, whatever
you want to call it. This means that the company's
enterprise value is 6.5 times its annual
revenue, right? So that's how you calculate
the EV to sales ratio. See you all the next video.
Thank you very much.
29. Enterprise Value to EBIDTA Ratio: Hi, everyone. Today we'll be discussing the
enterprise value to Abita EV to bita ratio.
So let's dig right in. EVE to EBITA ratio is a key
evaluation metric that helps investors understand
how much it would cost to acquire a company
relative to its EBITA. It shows how many times a company's EBITA you'd
be paying to acquire it. So in the previous video, we discussed EV to sales ratio. So the EVI to sales
ratio basically shows how many times a company's sales you'd be paying to acquire it. So in this, we focus on IBITa. Now, I made a video in detail. Please go watch what is IBTa because I'm not going
to explain it today. So let's have a look at
the formula very simple. We take enterprise
value divided by IBITa. So question is, let's assume a company has the
following financial details, market cap worth $500 million, total debt worth $200 million, cash $50 million, and
EBITA, $50 million. So let's calculate
enterprise value first. Go watch my enterprise
value video if you're still having problems. So we take the market cap, add the total debt
subtract cash. We get 650 million. So 650 million divided by IBITA 650000000/50000000, we get 13. So this means that the
company's enterprise value is 13 times its IBITA. This is a market
valuation ratio. So, guys, that's it for today. Thank you very much.
Have a good day.
30. Demystifying the Statement of Profit & Loss - Basic Version: You have to understand
the difference between cost of
sales and expenses. Cost and expenses are two
different components. They are as different
as day and night, so do not mix them. Okay? I would give you
an example of KFC. In both cases, for cost
of sales and expenses, we would talk about KFC. Now I'm going to ask
you one question. What is KFC's main product? Their main product
is fried chicken. So if I ask you what could be the cost of
their main product? They could be the
cost of chicken, the most important component of the product, cost of potatoes. Who likes KFC without
french fries? No one, right? Cost of buns. For the burgers,
very, very important. Cost of flour and the
seasoning for the chicken mix. These are all very, very important and
the cost of drinks. Okay? So these items are needed
to prepare the inventory, to prepare the co
product of KFC. So, guys, cost of sales are the direct costs involved in acquiring the inventory
to be resold. In cost of sale, we only
focus on one component, and that's inventory,
the direct costs. If I talk about expenses, expenses are the overall costs
of running the business. They are not limited
to inventory. If I talk about KFC, they could be the rent bill,
salaries, electricity, gas. These are all the overall
bills a business pays. This is not related
with inventory, okay? They are all indirect. I hope you understand
the difference between cost of sales and expenses. Moving on, you have to
understand the difference between carriage inwards
and carriage outwards. This is also very important. So, guys, let me give you an
example of carriage inwards. Let's say the
business location of XYZ Limited is in Sydney and
their supplier is in London. So this is a very,
very important point. Look at the distance
between London and Sydney. It's one of the longest
flights in the world today. 20 hours and 30 minutes. Imagine the cost involved. So if the business imports
inventory from London, it's going to be massive. The cost would be
extremely high. So this is called
carriage inwards, okay? The cost of transporting goods
to the business location. Now, this is part of the
cost of sale because this is a direct cost
related to inventory. Okay? So this is added
in the cost of sales. On the other hand, carriage outwards is
something different. It's the cost of delivering
goods to the customers. It's like the delivery charges. When you order
something from Amazon or from Ebay or Shopify, sometimes you won't
pay delivery charges. That's borne by the
business alone. So that's carriage outwards. Now, carriage outwards is
not your cost of sale. It's your expense because this is not related
with inventory. After the goods have been
acquired from London, after the products have
been imported from London, when it's time to deliver
the product to the customer, there is carriage outwards. So this is an expense. It's not related. It's not adding or increasing
the cost of your inventory. So remember the main difference is carriage inwards
is part of the cost of sale and carriage
outwards is an expense. Alright? Let's move on. Let's look at the
difference between gross profit and net profit. Now that you understand sales, you understand cost
of sales expenses, so this would be easy for
you all to understand. So, guys, gross profit
and net profit, gross profit is the profit
a business makes after deducting the direct cost
of sales from revenue. Okay? You only subtract your cost of sales
from the revenue. It shows how profitable the core business activity is and how demanding
is the product, how well the business
controls its costs. This is gross profit. The formula is revenue
minus cost of sales. So what is net profit? The word net means after all deductions. The word gross means
before any deductions. So net profit is the final profit after
deducting all expenses, including cost of sales
from the revenue. This reflects the
overall profitability, the overall picture
of the business. So the formula is gross profit
minus expenses. All right? Right. Moving on. We have to understand the
movement of inventory. This is very, very important. We have to understand the movement of inventory
and cost of sales. So, guys, the first
thing a business uses. The first part of cost of sale is called
opening inventory. Okay? Now, this is the
value of the goods the business has on hand at
the beginning of the period. It's the leftover from
the previous period. The first priority of
the business would be to sell your
opening inventory. Consume this inventory. Otherwise, it could get worn
out or it could get expired. Okay, for example, a bakery starts the year
with 100 bags of flour. They already had 100
bags in the warehouse. This is the inventory left from the previous
period, okay? So this is the first
portion of cost of sales. After opening inventory,
there's purchases, you will buy more inventory. Okay? Example, the business buys
500 more bags of flour, and the total cost of
this was $2,500, okay? After purchases, you would
return some purchases. Obviously, when you're
ordering 500 bags, it's possible at least one 2% of those items could be faulty. There could be some
defects in those items. So the bakery returns 50
bags of flour worth $250. And obviously importing
all the products. Now, not necessarily
from another country. It could be from another city or another town in your city. That still comes at a cost. So carriage inwards is
a very important cost. It's added to the purchases
to the cost of sales. It's the cost of shipping
or transporting the goods. So it costs $100 to have the 500 bags of flour
delivered, okay? This is also added
to the cost of sale a very, very
important component. Guys, do you honestly think a business had
opening inventory. They had 100 bags. They
bought 500 more bags. Now they have 600 bags. They returned 50. They have 550 bags. Do you honestly think a business can sell all of its inventory? That is likely, but
that's not so likely. This is possible, but
it's very difficult, especially for a new business. A business cannot sell
all of its inventory. They would be leftovers, okay? So those leftovers are
called closing inventory. Closing inventory
represents the value of goods that are unsold, okay? So like, for example, at the end of the year, you
have 200 bags of flour left. Worth $1,000. So this would be subtracted
from the cost of sale. The reason is what does
cost of sale mean? The cost of the items
you are selling. So closing inventory is unsold. So why would I add this
cost? I would subtract this. Secondly, the unsold items would be transferred to
the next period. If they're not sold today,
they would be sold tomorrow. So the closing inventory wouldn't be added in
the cost of sale. It would become the opening
inventory of the next period, and it would be sold in
the next period, okay? Right. Now, based on this, let's prepare the formula
for cost of sales. Right. We start with
our opening inventory, as I explained earlier,
which was $500. We add purchases, we
subtract purchases returns. We add carriage inwards, we subtract closing inventory, and the answer we get, this is our direct costs
or cost of sales. Okay? Now, we only subtract returns
and closing inventory. We subtract returns because
this is not a cost. We are returning the
product to the supplier. So why is this
included in purchases? If I return some products, I have to subtract
or adjust the cost. And closing inventory,
the unsold products, they wouldn't ever be
part of the cost of sale. As I said, they would be
transferred to the next period. So closing inventory of
this period would be the opening inventory of
the next period, okay? Right. I'm slowly slowly building a picture of the two
statements we prepare, statement of profit and loss and statement of
financial position. So let's see what is the
statement of profit and loss. So previously, this was
known as income statement, and I would refer this
as income statement. Whenever I teach
you, I'm sure you heard income statement
from my mouth many times, especially when we were preparing
the ledges, T accounts. So it's okay. This is shorter
and easier to understand. But in your exam, you
would always call it statement of profit
and loss, right? So this statement summarizes all the incomes and
expenses of a business. It shows how profitable are you. The main purpose is to
calculate the profit. How much profit are you generating from your
core activities? So remember, statement
of profit and loss is made for one year only. I won't include the
previous year's expenses in this income statement. I won't include the next year's expenses in this
income statement. We only focus on one
year only, right? Okay, so this is how the statement of profit
and loss looks like. We take our sales, subtract our sale returns.
We get this value. It's called the net sales. We subtract cost of sales,
what I just toad you. So when I subtract the
sales and cost of sales, we get the gross profit. We add our other income. If you go to my
very first videos on important definitions, I told you there are
two type of incomes, your main income and your
secondary source of income. L a school. Their main source of revenue
would be the school fees. But if there's a canteen,
giving them rent, if they sold some extra
furniture, they earned income. So these are all the secondary
sources, the side hustles. So we add that separately, which we call other income. We subtract all our expenses, then we get our ultimate
profit for the year. How much profit we
made in the year. This is called your net profit. This is your first statement.
31. Demystifying the Statement of Profit & Loss - Advanced Version: Hello, my genius accountants. Welcome to the next video. Today, we would be discussing advanced financial
statements and in specific, the advanced version of the
statement of profit and loss, a practical and a
realistic example. So the website, you can see, is known as yahoo finance.com. And in yahoo finance.com, you would find the financials of all companies that
are registered in NASDAQ in the American
stock market. There's a company with the
name Micro Algo Incorporation, this is a Chinese company
which is registered in NASDAQ. So let's have a look at the
statement of profit and loss. My aim for today is that I
want to break down each term in as simple and easy language as possible in the
most easy way. So everyone, regardless of
the background you're from, you would understand
the financial statement of a company easily and swiftly. Let's begin right away. So first thing that you might find peculiar is
something known as TTM. So TTM basically stands
for trailing 12 months. Now, trailing 12 months means the most recent 12 months of
a company's financial data. Now, not necessarily a
calendar of fiscal year, but the last 12 months
counting backward from today. So if in simple terms,
I give you an example, if you open your bank statement from the website of your bank, would be an option
in which you could choose the recent 12 months
beginning from today. So as you can see,
today is 22 April. So 12 months would go somewhere around
tentative 22 April 2024. So that's the trailing
12 months data. It's the most recent data. It gives you the most up to date view of a company's performance. Let's begin. So the formula or the pattern of the statement of profit
and loss is the same. First is the total
revenue that's given. After the total revenue, you would subtract
the cost of revenue. You would get the gross profit. You would subtract the
operating expenses. You would add any other
income if you have. Then you would get
your operating income or operating profit. Now, operating income signifies the profit from the core
operations of a company. After operating income, you
would see other expenses. But before other expenses, there's something
mentioned here, net non operating interest
income or expense. So these are basically the interest obligations
of a company, like if a company
borrows a loan, so the interest they have to
repay, that's an expense. That would be subtracted. And if the company lent
a loan to another party, they would receive interest. That's income, that
would be added. Now, why is this over here? Why is this not part of
the operating expense? Reason is very simple, that these interest obligations, they are not operating expenses. They do not signify expenses from your core
business operations. These are simply
other obligations, so it would be better to
treat them separately. Let's move on.
Right. After this, you can see the other income. So other incomes would be added, other expenses would
be subtracted. Then whatever income you get, that's known as pre tax income. Pre tax income is also known as the income before
deduction of tax. So it's the income in which you've deducted your
interest obligations. But tax has not yet
been deducted, right? Then after this, you
have your tax provision. So tax provision is basically the estimated taxes the
company needs to pay. And after this, you would
get the net income, right? So net income, basically, that's the operating income. But you can see
something peculiar. The net income is also known as net income for
common stockholders. Now, I want to explain this. In simple terms, it tells you how much profit is available
to common shareholders. Common shareholders
are the people who hold ordinary
shares in a company. Okay. It's the final profit that belongs to the
owners of common stock. After all costs, taxes, obligations, preference
dividends have been deducted. So in a company, there are two type
of stockholders. They're the common stockholders, also known as ordinary
stockholders, and then they're the
preferred stockholders. So the common stockholders are also known as the
owners of a company. Right. Then you get
your net income. Right. Now let's move on. Right? After net income,
what do you see? After net income, we have
the earning per share. Now, I explain earnings
per share in detail. Basically how much profit is allocated to each
share of stock. Then after earnings per share, you would see the total
operating income as reported. Now, this may include
all operating activities that are adjusted for any
specific accounting treatments, and it's often the
official figure shared in financial statements. So if I give you an example, let's say the operating income
for company was $9,000. But after the profit
was reported, there were some
additional adjustments that were required, like probably stock
based compensations. Now, the total
operating income and the total operating income as reported would slightly differ. So that would be
adjusted over a year. After this, the total expenses. So total expenses over here. In this section, it basically means the cost of revenue
plus operating expenses, plus interest, plus taxes, and plus other expenses. So basically, all
these outflows, if you add all of them, you would find them in
the total expenses. Now after this, you would
see something which say net income from continuing
and discontinued operations. Now, these are technical
accounting terms, but I'll try to simplify
it in easy language. So basically, this
includes earnings from ongoing operations and
any business units that were sold or shut down. If I give you a very
simple example, let's say, a company sold its
bakery division, but it still runs a coffee shop. So now, profits from both
would be shown over here. What is still ongoing and the bakery that was shut down, that
would be over here. Then after this, we have
the normalized income. So normalized income basically refers to income that's
adjusted to remove unusual one time events so that you can better
assess ongoing performance. Now, every company, they could earn income from ray sources,
from unusual sources. For example, if a company
sells one of its asset, if a company sells its
building or its machine, these are not
ongoing operations. These are very rare that
could happen once a while. So that would be
reflected over here. So if I give you
a small example, let's say your net
income was $10,000, but there was a gain
on disposal of $2,000. So the gain on disposal is
a one time gain, right? So that would be subtracted
from the net income, and then the remaining balance would be reflected over her. Then there's interest income, this is showed
separately, right? It's showed separately, and then the interest
expenses in the net, the net of both would be shown
separately here as well. Then there would be some ratios earning before interest and tax, then EBITA would be
mentioned here as well. Now, we covered all
this in detail. Now, after IBITa you would find reconciled cost of revenue. So this is basically an adjusted figure of
cost of revenue that may include standardized changes or breakdowns for easier
comparison over time. So again, transactions such as any changes for stock based compensations or any other accounting treatments, they would be
mentioned over here. Then there's reconciled
depreciation. So Again, if depreciation had been
adjusted for reporting purposes, you know, depreciation in tax and depreciation accounting, both are calculated separately. So the reconciled values
would be mentioned over here. Then there's net income
from continuing operation, net of minority interest. Now, this may sound
a bit confusing, but it's actually
very straightforward. Net income from ongoing
business excludes the portion owned by minority
shareholders in a company. So majority shareholders are shareholders that have a significant stake
in the company. So example, if a company owns 80% of a subsidiary or
branch that earned $1,000, so $800 would be yours. The $200 would belong
to minority owners. So that would be adjusted
or reflected over here. Then there are other unusual
items excluding goodwill. So one time gains or
losses, except Goodwill. The exception is
goodwill Goodwill is not recorded over here. The reason is Goodwill
is an intangible asset. It would not be reflected in the statement
of provident loss. Then after this, we have a
total of the unusual items. So these are, again, all the one time ray items
that affect profits. All that would be
mentioned over here. It could be impayment or any, legal losses that were incurred. Then there's normalized IBITa so normalized ibta
is when you adjust your ibta to remove
all the one time or unusual items for better
comparison across companies. Then there's tax rate
for calculations. So this is basically the tax rate used to
estimate tax effects in other calculations,
like normalized income. So, for example, if the
normalized income is $100,000 and the
tax rate is 25%, so the tax impact would be 25% times 100,000,
which is $25,000. And then finally, there's
tax effect of unusual items. So this is basically the estimated taxes linked to all the unusual items
that we've discussed. So for example, if a company has a one
time loss of $4,000. So what do I mean
by one time loss? Like a loss that
happens very rarely, not so frequent, like, if a company sells its
building at a loss. So let's say it sold it
for a loss of $4,000. So it would reduce
the taxes by $1,000, then the tax effect of unusual items would be
recorded as $1,000. So these were This was an entire explanation
of all the terms mentioned in this statement
of profit and loss. The reason why I
explained all this in easy terms is so that you can
go to Yahoo Finance today, study the financial statements
of a company, right? And all these have
a link to ratios. Like we have total revenue. We have gross profit. So we can calculate the
gross profit margin. We have cost of revenue
and gross profit. So we can calculate
the cost margin. We have operating expense
and operating income. We can calculate the
expense to income ratio. And apart from this, we have
the earnings per share. We have interest income,
interest expenses, depreciation, IBITA. So the statement
of profit and loss would be very helpful
in calculating ratios. We'll see all that
in the next video. So I hope after this video, you will be confident in accessing financial
statements of any company and make useful decisions.
Thank you very much. See you in the next video.
32. Demystifying the Statement of Financial Position - Basic Version: The second statement is called the statement of
financial position. Now, this was previously
known as the balance sheet, and this is what
I would call it. Whenever I teach you
guys, it's easier. I mean, how can I
write statement of financial position
so many times? So we would refer to
it as balance sheet. In your exam, you'll always refer it as statement
of financial position. So this provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. If I'm talking about 20:10, up till 2010, how many non
current assets do they have? How many liabilities
do they own? So it provides a snapshot of the financial position at
a specific point in time. It shows what the company owns, assets, what it owes,
liabilities, and equity. It shows these three items. Now, do you guys remember
once upon a time, I taught you something called
the accounting equation, and I told you the
accounting equation applies in the balance sheet. The entire balance sheet is made in line with the
accounting equation. That same formula, assets is equal to
equity plus liabilities. That same concept, I taught
you that it's an equation. It must balance
the assets amount must be same with the equity
plus liabilities amount. So that same concept
applies here as well. Now, let's have a look
at the balance sheet. This is the balance sheet. We take the total of assets,
total assets, equity. I taught you the formula
of equity capital plus profit minus
drawings and liability. So this value of
total assets must be the same with total
equity and liabilities. And by the way, this net profit comes from the income statement. This is why both statements
are in line with each other. They are dependent
on each other, okay? It must balance. If
it doesn't balance, there's a problem in you, not the question. Remember that?
33. Demystifying the Statement of Financial Position - Advanced Version: Hi, everyone, Welcome
to the next video. In this video, we
would break down the complicated or
advanced version of statement of financial
position. Let's get started. Now again, we are
interpreting the same company we did in the previous
lesson in which we demystified the statement
of financial position. So today, we would
crack the code in the statement of financial
position. Let's get started. Now, the first term you
can see is total assets. So this includes all
assets of a company. It could be current assets, non current assets, tangible
assets, intangible assets. These are all the assets. Then the next term says, total liabilities, net
minority interest. So this basically means all the money the
company owes to others. Plus the share of subsidiaries owned by
outside investors. So imagine you owe the
bank for a car loan and someone else owns a piece
of your business, right? Then after this, there's total equity, gross
minority interest. So this basically means the
value left for the owners, the shareholders,
the stockholders after liabilities are
subtracted from assets. And this includes
both the company's equity and minority interests. Oh. This is basically what you own after paying
off everything you owe. Then after this, there's
total capitalization. Now, this is simple.
This basically means the total money
the company has raised from debt and equity
to finance its operations. So, this would be the total
debt plus total equity. Let's look at the other terms. Then there's common
stock equity. So basically, this is the
value of shares owned by the common shareholders or
the ordinary shareholders. This is part of equity, and this does not include the preferred stock or
the preferred shares. So if I give you an example, let's say 1 million
shares were issued at $10 each to the ordinary
or the common stockholders. So $10 million would be
the common stock equity. Then we can see capital
lease obligations. So these are basically the long term lease
agreements which are treated like debt
because obviously the company's essentially
buying the asset, right? So if I give you
a small example, let's say a company leases
a machine for five years. Records the machine as an asset and the lease payments
as a liability. And as the time
passes by and as it realizes the lease payments, then that would be transferred
out from the liabilities. Then we have the net
tangible assets. These are basically all assets minus liabilities,
but, of course, excluding intangible
stuff, like goodwill, patents, brand value, et cetera. Then there's working capital, a very easy term. Working capital is basically how much short term cash or liquid assets the company has to run their
daily operations. So basically current
assets minus current liabilities, we
covered this in detail. Then there's invested capital. So invested capital basically is the total money invested in the company by both the
shareholders and lenders. So this is basically the money working in the
business to generate returns. Then there's tangible book
value tangible book value basically shows the real
physical value of the company. It's the net value
of the company, excluding intangible assets
like goodwill or trademarks. Then total debt, very
straightforward, all the borrowed
money, both short term and long term obligations. Then we have the shares issued. Now, these are the value of the shares issued,
right? The value. And then we have the number of ordinary shares
issued, right? Right. So this was a walk through breakdown of the terms of the statement of
financial position. I hope after this video, you would be more confident in assessing the financial
statements of companies. And you can always use
this video as a guideline. So if you're assessing the statement of
financial position of a company or you probably want to make investment decisions
or any other decisions, then you can always use
this video as a reference. So see you in the next
video. Thank you very much.